Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Ritesh Trikha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. App...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashish Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.D.S. Sodhi & Rajeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to approach the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 116
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Limited V/S Mrs. Nirmal Milkha Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajbir Singh Guron, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:544 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:09.02.2017Mrs. Nirmal Milkha Singh, Aged _ Years, W/o Sh. Milkha Singh, Resident of House No.725, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh.……Compl...
Case Number: 544
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shima Saggar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:690 of 2016Date of Institution:14.10.2016Date of Decision:09.02.2017Shima Saggar wife of Shri Sarbjit R. Saggar, resident of House No.2237, Sector 48-C, Chandigarh, Correspondence Address: #436, Block...
Case Number: 690
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Harvinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vipul Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:595 of 2016Date of Institution:15.09.2016Date of Decision:07.02.2017Ms. Harvinder Kaur w/o Inderjit Singh r/o H.No.951, Phase 3B-2, Mohali, Punjab.……Complainant.VersusM/s Puma Realtors P...
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd & anr. V/S Smt. Amarjit Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paveen K Kataria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy of paper-book...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jogendra Pal Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:602 of 2016Date of Institution:19.09.2016Date of Decision:02.02.2017Jogendra Pal Singh S/o Sh. Dharam Singh R/o H.No.697, Sector 80, Mohali, Punjab – 140308.Gagandeep Singh Arora son of Jogendra...
Case Number: 602
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shamsher Tandon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:641 of 2016Date of Institution:28.09.2016Date of Decision:02.02.2017Shamsheer Tandon w/o Sh. Amit Tandon,Amit Tandon S/o Sh. V. K. Tandon,Both presently residing at House No.-1305, Sector – 50/B...
Case Number: 641
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Gaurav Bhatia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhatia, Decree Holder and Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Judgment Debtor(s) that the matter has amicably been settled. Signed calculation sheet and schedule of payment have been placed on record. In view of above, this Execution Application...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Yogesh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rohit Tanwar, representative
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:21 of 2017Date of Institution:09.01.2017Date of Decision:18.01.2017Ashoo Tuli son of Sh.N.C. Tuli, resident of House No.26, Doctor’s Enclave, Stadium Road, GPO Distt. Patiala-147001.Amandeep Sin...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.