Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd & anr. V/S Smt. Amarjit Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen K Kataria, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama alongwith copy of resolution filed on behalf of the Judgment Debtors, which is taken on record. Counsel for the parties state that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and in response to the settlement in Court, three post-dated cheques bearing...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Manpreet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:490 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:02.03.2017Manpreet Singh son of S. Gurmeet Singh resident of Thanedar House New Model Town, VPO Sahnewal, Distt. Ludhiana, Punjab.2nd Address:...
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ramesh Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holders that against the order under execution, the Opposite Parties/Judgment Debtors has gone in appeal, wherein, subject to deposit the amount, operation of the order has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel for the decree holders wishes...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vishal Kataria
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that against the order under execution, the Opposite Parties/Judgment Debtors has gone in appeal, wherein, subject to deposit the amount, operation of the order has been stayed. In view of above, Counsel for the decree holder wishes t...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Nagra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:322 of 2016Date of Institution:05.07.2016Date of Decision:20.02.2017Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal, Aged 67 years S/o Late Sh. S. S. Jindal, Plot No.315, Industrial Area, Phase II, Panchkula (Hry.).…&h...
Case Number: 322
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Baninder Singh Sroan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
During the course of arguments, it was noticed that power of attorney, on the basis of which, this complaint has been filed, does not authorize the attorney to undertake any legal proceedings against the Opposite Parties. Furthermore, in subsequent special power of attorney place...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Upvinder Singh Dhall
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/128/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/80/20161. Upvinder Singh DhallS/o Sh. Upkar Singh Dhall, Both resident of H.No. 2234, Second Floor, Sector 38 C, Chandigarh............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma R...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Parveen Mangla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/129/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/79/20161. Parveen Manglas/o Sh. Subhash Mangla, R/o H.No. 1757, Nirwana Society Sec 49-B, Chd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.a Co. incorpo...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Deepak Saluja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. App...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vikas Nijhawan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. Appea...
Case Number: 131
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.