Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
TIMPLE JAIN & 2 ORS. V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SOOD
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1437 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/06/2016 in Complaint No. 09/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/1109/2017,IA/11049/2016,IA/11050/2016,IA/11051/20161. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS ...
Case Number: 1438
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2017
SAMIR SINGH & ANR. V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate MS. NARENDER KAUR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1439 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 23/08/2016 in Complaint No. 208/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SAT...
Case Number: 1439
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Mohinder Singh Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sunil Bhutani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:72 of 2017Date of Institution:20.01.2017Date of Decision:31.03.2017Sunil Bhutani son of Sh.Mohinder Kumar Bhutani, House No.1225-9B, Vishnu Nagar, Jagadhari Workshop, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.…&he...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Ashish Arora
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The calculation made by the decree holder is not correct, as it is not in consonance with the decree passed. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Lib...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Gurlal Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated at the bar by the Counsel for the parties that the matter stands settled. On the last date of hearing i.e. 14.03.2017, a cheque in the sum of Rs.8 Lacs was handed over by the Judgment Debtors to the Decree Holder. Counsel for the decree holder states that that ch...
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lalit Gulati
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:760 of 2016Date of Institution:03.11.2016Date of Decision:28.03.2017Mr. Lalit Gulati S/o Sh. Om Parkash Gulati R/o #167F, Pocket-IV, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I, New Delhi.……Complainant.V e r s...
Case Number: 760
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Samir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the Judgment Debtors has placed on record settlement deed dated 25.03.2017 between the parties. In terms of conditions contained in the settlement deed, referred to above, he has also handed over four post-dated cheques i.e. bearing Nos.142912 dated 15.07.2017 in the ...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Lt. Col. Dalvinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the Judgment Debtors has placed on record letter dated 27.03.2017 showing that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and as per the calculation sheet annexed with the said letter, total amount of Rs.82,90,540/- by way of three post-dated cheques i.e...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jyoti Chanana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:759 of 2016Date of Institution:03.11.2016Date of Decision:22.03.2017Jyoti Chanana W/o Sh. Amit Chanana R/o House No.624, Sector 7, Gurgaon-Haryana.……Complainant.V e r s u sPuma Realtors ...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.