company-name-logo

Puma

Latest Judgments

Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.

Rajasthan

PUMA Store V/S 78/2017 Shekhar Nagpal

Puma  

Court Name: Ganganagar

Appelant Advocate Varinder Dhunna

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 27-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Hardish Kumar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:961 of 2016Date of Institution:26.12.2016Date of Decision:18.05.2017Hardish Kumar Sharma s/o Sh. Ramesh Pal Hashdir,Ms. Sakshi Sharma w/o Sh. Hardish Kumar Sharma,Resident of H.No.40, Municipal Colony...

Case Number: 961

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Parvesh Kumar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:962 of 2016Date of Institution:26.12.2016Date of Decision:18.05.2017Parvesh Kumar s/o Sh. Ramesh Pal Hashdir Residnet of H.No.40, Municipal Colony, Pathankot, Punjab- 145001.……Complainan...

Case Number: 962

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Dr. Gurinder Singh Bholla

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sahil Khunger, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Faced with the order dated 12.05.2017 passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.783 of 2017, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file it again, if need be. Libert...

Case Number: 192

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sukhpal Singh Bhullar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adarsh Malik, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:82 of 2017Date of Institution:24.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Sukhpal Singh Bhullar son of Sh. Darshan Singh, resident of House No.2094, Sector-15, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u...

Case Number: 82

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ajay Nashikkar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:776 of 2016Date of Institution:07.11.2016Date of Decision:02.05.2017Ajay Nashikkar s/o Late Sh. B. R. Nashikkar r/o 117, Shubham Complex, Nau-Gaja Road, Shinde-Ki-Chawani, Lashkar, Gwalior, residing a...

Case Number: 776

|

Date of Filing: 07-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-05-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kharaiti Lal Malhotra

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:969 of 2016Date of Institution:28.12.2016Date of Decision:02.05.2017Kharaiti Lal Malhotra S/o Late Sh. Chaman Lal Malhotra R/o H.No.324-A, Sector 51A, Chandigarh.Pawan Malhotra S/o Kharaiti Lal Malhot...

Case Number: 969

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-05-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Pankaj Mahajan

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Dated: 1/5/2017ORDER Today, in Court, towards full and final settlement of all claims raised by the Decree Holder/complainant, against the Judgment debtor, in terms of order passed by this Commission on 23.05.2016 in Consumer Complaint No.25 of 2016, Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, ...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Pankaj Garg

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Dated: 1/5/2017ORDER Today, in Court, towards full and final settlement of all claims raised by the Decree Holder/complainant, against the Judgment debtors, in terms of order passed by this Commission on 26.04.2016 in Consumer Complaint No.309 of 2015, Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate...

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2017

NCDRC

PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ANR. V/S YOGESH KUMAR VERMA

Puma  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. BHARAT SOOD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 368 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 18/01/2017 in Complaint No. 20/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. YOGESH KUMAR VERMAS/O. SH. DALIP CHAND, PRESENT RESIDING AT : H NO. 34, CLIFFORD TERRACE, EAST R...

Case Number: 368

|

Date of Filing: 23-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.