Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/219/20171. Ms. Adarsh Rani ParmarH.No. 16, Sat Kartar Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.Regd. Office No. 5, Dhanraj Chambers, 1st Floor, Satbari, New ...
Case Number: 219
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Divya Godara, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER The matter has finally been settled between the parties. Ms. Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate appearing as Proxy for Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, Counsel for the Judgment Debtors, to discharge their liability in term of judgment dated 27.10.2016 passed by this Commission in Complai...
Case Number: 193
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:230 of 2017Date of Institution:17.03.2017Date of Decision:08.08.2017Paramjit Kaur Gill W/o Gurmail SinghCorrespondence Address: - 679-E, BRS Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab.……ComplainantVersusM/...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajeev Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/202/20171. Sukhjeet SinghShop No. 20, Anaj Mandi, Rathia, Haryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd.SCO 6-8, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the th...
Case Number: 544
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No.194 of 2017Date of Institution03.03.2017Date of Decision31.07.2017Rupinder Singh S/o Sadar Sadhu Singh, resident of Ward No.8, Tehsil Budhlada, District Mansa (Punjab). Presently resident of...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Cost of Rs.2,000/- i.e. Rs.1,000-/- each in CC No.64 of 2017 & 65 of 2017, have been deposited by Counsel for the complainants in Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt dated 13.07.2017, placed on record. After arguing for some time, on account of some technical objec...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.