Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors V/S Rajinder Chaudhary
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Garg,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Ms Jasmeet Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/243/20171. Ms Jasmeet Kaurd/o Sh. Jaswant Singh, H.No. 1599 Sector 18-D, Chandigarh 160018...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma Realtors Private LimitedRegd. Office at No. 5, Dhanraj Chambers, 1st...
Case Number: 243
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
PUMA AB Corpsmanagemant Pvt. Ltd. V/S Hanumant Kumar
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Kulwinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/89/20171. Hanumant KumarS/o Late R.C. Jhingan R/o K.No.311, Phase 6, Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. PUMA AB Corpsmanagemant Pvt. Ltd.The North Country Mall, F012B, Ist Floor, Mohali Kharar Road, Mohali, through its M.D.Proprietor/In...
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sudhir Kumar Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ORDER To satisfy the liability imposed upon the Judgment Debtors vide order dated 03.11.2016, the Judgment Debtors have handed over 4 post-dated cheques in the name of the decree holder, namely, ‘Sudhir Kumar Mittal’, in the total sum of Rs.1,11,95,789/-, as per deta...
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Aarushi Parmar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:199 of 2017Date of Institution:07.03.2017Date of Decision:24.08.2017Aarushi Parmar wife of Bimal Jeet Singh,Bimal Jeet Singh son of Baldev SinghComplainants No.1 & 2 both are resident of House No....
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Gurjeet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:303 of 2017Date of Institution:07.04.2017Date of Decision:24.08.2017Gurjeet Singh S/o Sh. Daljit Singh R/o H.No.278, Phase-3-A, Mohali.Arashdeep Kaur D/o Sh. Santokh Singh R/o H.No.278, Phase-3-A, Moh...
Case Number: 303
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S Timple Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/223/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/10/20161. Timple JainPatiala............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd,Chandigarh............Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PR...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S Hardeep Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER To satisfy the liability imposed upon the Judgment Debtors vide order dated 27.06.2016, the Judgment Debtors have handed over 12 post-dated cheques i.e. 4 post-dated cheques each in the name of the decree holders, namely, ‘Hardeep Kaur, Ramesh Kumar Jain and Janeshwa...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Manpreet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
ORDER Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) states that Company is ready to settle this dispute as an exception and not as a rule. At the time of arguments, Sh.Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) stated that the complainant will be shifted to flat bearing No.GBL-02-002, Tower L, measuring 1575 sq...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gautam Pathania, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER At the time of hearing, the matter has finally been settled between the parties. To discharge their liability imposed vide judgment dated 20.02.2017, passed in Consumer Complaint No.322 of 2016, filed by Sh. Jawahar Lal Jindal, Decree Holder/complainant, the Judgment Debto...
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.