company-name-logo

Puma

Latest Judgments

Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Surinder Singh Grewal

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER On the last date of hearing i.e. 03.10.2017, following order was passed by this Commission :-“In terms of this Commission order dated 21.09.2017, the Judgment Debtors were to bring demand draft equal to 30% of the amount due but that has not been done. Instead, post-...

Case Number: 285

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2017

NCDRC

SUDHIR KUMAR MITTAL V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.

Puma  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1539 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 03/11/2016 in Complaint No. 268/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS RESISTERED OFFICE AT NO.-5,DHANARAJ CHAMBERS,1ST FLOOR SABIT...

Case Number: 1539

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2017

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors V/S Rajinder Singh

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Deipa Asdhir Dubey, adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...

Case Number: 354

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Ms. Manju Malhotra

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER This execution application is disposed of by giving liberty to the decree holder/complainant to send message again to the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties to make the payment. We are hopeful that amount will be paid, failing which, penal consequences will prevail. The lib...

Case Number: 353

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-10-2017

Punjab

Vijepal Singh Mann V/S Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ramnik Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 765

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jogendra Pal Singh

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) appearing on behalf of the Judgment Debtors has handed over total six post dated cheques i.e. three each, in favour of ‘Jogendra Pal Singh’ & ‘Gagandeep Singh Arora’, bearing Nos.158565 & 158568 both dated 30.09.2017, ...

Case Number: 250

|

Date of Filing: 27-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 29-12-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors V/S Mrs. Mansi Khanna

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Today, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of judgment debtors No.1 & 2 has handed over total six post-dated cheques bearing Nos.158577 dated 30.09.2017 in the sum of Rs.15,98,530/-, 158571 dated 30.09.2017 in the sum of Rs.15,98,530/-, 158579 dated 31.12.2017 in the sum of Rs.16,3...

Case Number: 259

|

Date of Filing: 05-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 29-12-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Sandeep Goyal

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER This execution application is disposed of by giving liberty to the decree holder/complainant to send message again to the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties to make the payment. We are hopeful that amount will be paid, failing which, penal consequences will prevail. The libe...

Case Number: 350

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Baninder Singh Sroan

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) appearing on behalf of Opposite Parties No.1 to 3 has placed reliance on judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE P...

Case Number: 485

|

Date of Filing: 14-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2017

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., V/S Lalit Kumar Dhiman

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manish Jain, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER As per the prayer made, when amount claimed by the complainant under different heads is added, it goes to beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the ratio of judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHU...

Case Number: 694

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.