Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER On the last date of hearing i.e. 03.10.2017, following order was passed by this Commission :-“In terms of this Commission order dated 21.09.2017, the Judgment Debtors were to bring demand draft equal to 30% of the amount due but that has not been done. Instead, post-...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1539 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 03/11/2016 in Complaint No. 268/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS RESISTERED OFFICE AT NO.-5,DHANARAJ CHAMBERS,1ST FLOOR SABIT...
Case Number: 1539
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deipa Asdhir Dubey, adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 354
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application is disposed of by giving liberty to the decree holder/complainant to send message again to the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties to make the payment. We are hopeful that amount will be paid, failing which, penal consequences will prevail. The lib...
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ramnik Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 765
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) appearing on behalf of the Judgment Debtors has handed over total six post dated cheques i.e. three each, in favour of ‘Jogendra Pal Singh’ & ‘Gagandeep Singh Arora’, bearing Nos.158565 & 158568 both dated 30.09.2017, ...
Case Number: 250
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of judgment debtors No.1 & 2 has handed over total six post-dated cheques bearing Nos.158577 dated 30.09.2017 in the sum of Rs.15,98,530/-, 158571 dated 30.09.2017 in the sum of Rs.15,98,530/-, 158579 dated 31.12.2017 in the sum of Rs.16,3...
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application is disposed of by giving liberty to the decree holder/complainant to send message again to the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties to make the payment. We are hopeful that amount will be paid, failing which, penal consequences will prevail. The libe...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) appearing on behalf of Opposite Parties No.1 to 3 has placed reliance on judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE P...
Case Number: 485
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER As per the prayer made, when amount claimed by the complainant under different heads is added, it goes to beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the ratio of judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHU...
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.