Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Private ltd. V/S Mr. Sourabh Ghosh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:313 of 2017Date of Institution:10.04.2017Date of Decision:31.10.2017Mr. Sourabh Ghosh S/o Sh. Prokash Chandra Ghosh, Aged about 44 years,Smt. Himika Ghosh W/o Sh. Sourabh Ghosh, Aged about 41 years,Bo...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Limited V/S Dr. Amit Khurana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:378 of 2017Date of Institution:03.05.2017Date of Decision:31.10.2017Dr. Amit Khurana, aged about 46 years, son of Sh. Som Nath Khurana R/o House No.52, Kesar Bagh Colony, Near NIS, Patiala.…&he...
Case Number: 378
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Limited V/S Naveen Setya
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:379 of 2017Date of Institution:03.05.2017Date of Decision:31.10.2017Naveen Setya aged about 37 years S/o Sh. Sudershan Setya R/o C-608, CGHS Limited, Sector 9, Rohini, Delhi at present resident of 530...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., V/S Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It transpires that price of the plot, in question, is Rs.73,10,073.66 (Annexure C-2). The complainant is seeking refund of Rs.75,74,652/- alongwith 16% interest and Rs.5 Lacs as compensation, sum total of which exceeds Rs.1 crore. In view of ratio of judgment of the Hon'b...
Case Number: 597
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Sunil Goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate appearing as proxy for Sh. Paras Money Goyal, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant and Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of Opposite Party No.1 states that the matter has amicably been settled. It is undertaken that the parties shall remain bound...
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Sarbjinder Singh Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate Counsel for the complainants and Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties state that the matter has amicably been settled. Copy of Settlement Deed has been placed on record. The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settl...
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Jawahar Lal Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gautam Pathania, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Sh. Hiren Jindal, son of the decree holder/complainant states that the judgment debtor has remitted the amount of bounced cheque in the sum of Rs.10,68,319/- alongwith penalty amount of Rs.20,000/- in the account of the decree holder through RTGS on 25.10.2017. In view of ...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Savita Dhingra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Judgment Debtors states that possession of the unit, in question, is ready and the same shall be handed over to the Decree Holders within 2-3 days positively. He further states that execution and registration of the sale deed, in questi...
Case Number: 299
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shamsher Tandon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D R Kaith, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Counsel for the decree holder states that the matter has been settled. In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw the execution application. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of this order be sent to the parti...
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2017
PUMA Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Surinder Singh Grewal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER On the last date of hearing i.e. 03.10.2017, following order was passed by this Commission :-“In terms of this Commission order dated 21.09.2017, the Judgment Debtors were to bring demand draft equal to 30% of the amount due but that has not been done. Instead, post-...
Case Number: 284
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.