Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Separate vakalatnamas filed on behalf of judgment debtors No.1 to 3, which are taken on record. It is an admitted fact that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1008 of 2016. This execution appl...
Case Number: 366
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER At the time of arguments, an objection was raised by Counsel for the Opposite Parties that if the relief claimed in Clause 25 (i) to (iv) is added together, the total value of the unit, in question, exceeds Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER At the time of arguments, an objection was raised by Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 that if the relief claimed in Clause 22 (a) to (d) is added together, the total value of the unit, in question, exceeds Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wi...
Case Number: 460
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of arguments, an objection was raised by Counsel for the Opposite Parties that if the relief claimed in Clause 23 (a) to (e) is added together, the total value of the unit, in question, exceeds Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants ...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Cost of Rs.1500/- has been paid to the proxy Counsel for the complainants. Cost of Rs.1500/- has been deposited by the Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 in the Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt dated 14.11.2017. When we add amount of total relief claimed by the complai...
Case Number: 459
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER Today, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors has placed, on record, calculation sheet, as per which, an amount of Rs.33,56,336/- is payable. Copy of calculation sheet has been supplied to the Counsel opposite. He has handed over one demand draft bearing No.3...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:305 of 2017Date of Institution:07.04.2017Date of Decision:3 Nov. 2017Jaspreet Singh Bedi son of Sh.Sarabjit Singh Bedi, resident of House No.2353, Phase-11, Sector 65, Mohali, through his General Powe...
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:305 of 2017Date of Institution:07.04.2017Date of Decision:3 Nov. 2017Jaspreet Singh Bedi son of Sh.Sarabjit Singh Bedi, resident of House No.2353, Phase-11, Sector 65, Mohali, through his General Powe...
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kapil Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 939
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:292 of 2017Date of Institution:05.04.2017Date of Decision:31.10.2017Vijay Chaudhary S/o Sh. R. D. Chaudhary R/o H.No.707, Saini Vihar, Phase-2, Baltana, Zirakpur, Punjab.……ComplainantV e...
Case Number: 292
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.