Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H S Dhandi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:372 of 2017Date of Institution:01.05.2017Date of Decision:21.11.2017Rajesh Madan s/o Sh. K. C. Madan,Sanjeev Madan s/o Sh. K. C. Madan,Both R/o H.No.97, Sector 12-A, Panchkula.……Complain...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:396 of 2017Date of Institution:11.05.2017Date of Decision:21.11.2017Shivang Sharma S/o Sh. Akshaya Sharma R/o H.No.1178, Pushpak Complex, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh – 160047.Suman Sharma W/o Sh. Ak...
Case Number: 396
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv K Bhatia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:421 of 2017Date of Institution:16.05.2017Date of Decision:21.11.2017Deepak Pandey son of Sh. S. K. Pandey, House No.186-A, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana.Ms. Sangeeta Pandey wife of Deepak Pandey son of Sh. ...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajat Chopra
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
ORDER If the price of the unit, in question, and other reliefs claimed are added together, in terms of ratio of judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTUR...
Case Number: 553
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/361/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/81/20161. Ritesh TrikhaS/o Sh. Sudesh Trikha, Resident of # 5672, Sector 38 (West), Chandigarh............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,chd...........
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Separate vakalatnamas filed on behalf of judgment debtors No.1 to 3, which are taken on record. It is an admitted fact that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1011 of 2016. This execution appl...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Separate vakalatnamas filed on behalf of judgment debtors No.1 to 3, which are taken on record. It is an admitted fact that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1010 of 2016. This execution appl...
Case Number: 363
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Separate vakalatnamas filed on behalf of judgment debtors No.1 to 3, which are taken on record. It is an admitted fact that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1009 of 2016. This execution ap...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Separate vakalatnamas filed on behalf of judgment debtors No.1 to 3, which are taken on record. It is an admitted fact that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1390 of 2016. This execution appl...
Case Number: 365
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.