Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
The complainants are seeking refund of amount paid with interest @15% p.a. At the time of arguments, very serious objection was raised by Sh.Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that when complaint was filed, the amount involved to determine pecuniary jurisdiction of...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that this Commission has no jurisdiction to try this complaint because when the complaint was filed, the amount claimed i.e. price of the unit, interest, compensation...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 440 OF 2013Navtej Johar Vs M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Proxy counsel for Sh....
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 441 OF 2013Arvind Chaudhary Vs M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Proxy counsel for...
Case Number: 441
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 487 OF 2013Bal V.Sehgal & Anr. Vs M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sanjiv Pabbi, Counsel for Complainants.Sh.Rohit Tanwar, Pro...
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed by this Commission :-“Sh. Rajesh Dhingra, Decree Holder No.2 states that the judgment debtors have remitted a sum of Rs.9,02,342/- against the bounced cheques, which is inclusive of Rs.40,000/-, on account of penalty, ...
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed by this Commission :-“Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors not filed. Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors to file Vakalatnama on the next date of hearing. On 05.12.2017, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM...
Case Number: 415
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kamaldeep S. Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. KAPIL KHER, KUNAL KHER & NAMITA SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 783 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 09/03/2017 in Complaint No. 645/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.(AN IREO GROUP COPANY), THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SH. AJAY K...
Case Number: 783
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
After arguing for some time, proxy Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of Opposite Party No.1. Liberty g...
Case Number: 458
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.