Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Naresh Bhandari
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:454 of 2017Date of Institution:31.05.2017Date of Decision:25.01.2018Naresh Bhandari son of Sh. Jaswant Lal Bhandari, Resident of H.No.145, Ramlila Ground, Pathankot, Punjab – 145001.Manmohan son...
Case Number: 454
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pankaj Khullar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:540 of 2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:25.01.2018Rakesh Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Satya Prakash Gupta R/o Flat No.385, AOT Complex, Sector 48-A, Chandigarh (U.T.).……Complain...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Gurnam Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsharn Singh Bajwa, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:561 of 2017Date of Institution:21.07.2017Date of Decision:25.01.2018Gurnam Kaur wife of Late Sh. Bhagwant Singh Pannu, resident of H.No.2409, Phase 10, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, through her Attorney ...
Case Number: 561
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Ashish Arora
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Sh.Varun Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder/complainant on getting instructions from Sh.Ashish Arora, decree holder, who is present in Court, states that default amount, qua which, this execution application was filed, has since been transferred by the judgm...
Case Number: 418
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
M/s Puma Realtors V/S Mrs. Mansi Khanna
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On 08.12.2017, following order was passed by this Commission:-“Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors states that due to communication gap, drafts could not be prepared, instead, he has handed over four post-dated cheques, all dated 27.12.2017, i.e. two chequ...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagbir Kaur Brar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Party raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint, at th...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vinod Kumar Thakur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jamaluddin Ansari, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Party that to calculate pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission, when we look into the total price of the unit, in question, and the relief claimed, the total amount will e...
Case Number: 519
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., V/S Arun Kumar Goel
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, a serious objection was raised by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that the relief claims including price of the unit, in question, will go beyond Rs.1 Crore. Faced with this situation, Ms. Narender Kaur, Advocate, Counsel for the co...
Case Number: 683
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
RAJEVEE GODARA V/S Puma SUKIJA TRADING COM...
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GIRESH VYAS
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2018
VINOD DUNDI V/S Puma SUKIJA TRADING COM...
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GIRESH VYAS
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.