company-name-logo

Puma

Latest Judgments

Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Satinder Kaur Sehgal

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.2 & 3 namely, Sh.Anupam Nagalia and Sh.Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given address(es). Towards full and final...

Case Number: 440

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2018

Punjab

PUMA V/S Saksham Saigal

Puma  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate Sahil Dawar

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/325/20171. Saksham SaigalS/o Vivek saigal,R/o House No. 3036, Sector 44-D, Chandigarh ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUMAPUMA Viom Enterprises, GF 15, Cosmo Plaza, Zirakpur Punjab 140603, Through its Proprietor/ Manager/ Authorised Signato...

Case Number: 325

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2018

Punjab

PUMA V/S Bharat Dawar

Puma  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate Sahil Dawar

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/326/20171. Bharat DawarS/o Sh Ashok Kumar, R/o House No. 1263, Sector 34-C, Chandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUMAPUMA Viom Enterprises, GF-15, Cosmo Plaza, Zirakpur, Punjab 140603 Through its Proprietor/ Manager/ Authorised Signato...

Case Number: 326

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2018

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagbir Kaur Brar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No.143 of 2017Date of Institution15.02.2017Date of Decision13.02.2018Jagbir Kaur Brar w/o Late Sh. Surjit Singh Brar r/o House No.609, Sector 16, Chandigarh currently residing in 10160, Atlanti...

Case Number: 143

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2018

Chandigarh

PUMA Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sukhpal Singh Bhullar

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adarsh Malik, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...

Case Number: 59

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Smt. Harbhajan Kaur

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vishal Gupta, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the dispute between the parties stands settled and compromise deed has been signed and possession has also been handed over. Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw the complaint. In view of above, the complaint is dismissed as ...

Case Number: 398

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sachin Mahajan

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:565 of 2017Date of Institution:24.07.2017Date of Decision:12.02.2018Sachin Mahajan S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mahajan R/o H.No.281, Channi Himmat, Jammu, J & K.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma ...

Case Number: 565

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2018

Chandigarh

M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sachin Sharma

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arif Qureshi, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:582 of 2017Date of Institution:01.08.2017Date of Decision:12.02.2018Sachin Sharma S/o Sh. Shanti Parkash Sharma R/o House No.2105, First Floor, Sector 69, Mohali, Punjab.Anuradha Sharma wife of Shri S...

Case Number: 582

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2018

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jogendra Pal Singh

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER Head Constable Puran Chand, who is present in Court, has submitted his report stating that as and when raid was conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given address as they have left the said premises. The said report is taken on record. Today in Co...

Case Number: 391

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2018

Chandigarh

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagjit Singh

Puma  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.

Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties raised a very serious objection that this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this complaint. We have perused the prayer made and when we looked into particulars of the unit, interest amount on the payments m...

Case Number: 366

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.