Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:601 of 2017Date of Institution:09.08.2017Date of Decision:05.03.2018Vishal Wadhwa S/o Sh. Prithvi Raj Wadhwa R/o #3562, Sector 71, Mohali, Punjab. Now at 3054, ATS Advantage, Plot No.17, Ahinsa Khand,...
Case Number: 601
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H S Dhandi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:695 of 2017Date of Institution:15.09.2017Date of Decision:05.03.20181. Shashi Luthra w/o Sunil Luthra,2. Sunil Luthra s/o Om Parkash Luthra,Both R/o H.No.683, Sector 12, Sonepat, Haryana.…&hell...
Case Number: 695
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2018
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Sahil Dawar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/411/20171. Ashok KumarS/o Sh. Lt. Kanhya Lal, R/o H.no.1263, Sector 34/C, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Puma Viom EnterprisesGF-15 COSMO PLAZA, Zirakpur, Punjab 140603, through its Proprietor/Manager/Authorized Signatory.2. Pum...
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Jasbir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/422/20171. Sarita KumariW/o sh.Ashok Kumar, R/o H.No.1263, Sector 34-C, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Puma Viom EnterprisesGF-15, COSMO PLAZA, Zirakpur, Punjab-140603, through its Proprietor/Manager/Authorized Signatory...........
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Towards full and final settlement of all claims raised by the decree holder in this execution application, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors has handed over a cheque bearing No.009291 dated 27.02.2018 in the sum of Rs.50,000/- to Sh. Varun Bhardwaj, Advocate f...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the decree holder/complainant states that during pendency of this execution application, the entire amount payable to the decree holder/complainant, as per judgment under execution, stood paid. The decree stands satisfied. In view of above, this execution application ...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.2 & 3 namely, Sh.Anupam Nagalia and Sh.Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given address(es). Towards full and final...
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.