Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
RITU LAKHANPAL V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. SAGAR & SAGAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 782 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 02/03/2017 in Complaint No. 490/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI N...
Case Number: 908
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Puma Realtor Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Chetan Mahajan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Guleria
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2018
Puma Realtor Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Viks Malik
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Guleria
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2018
Puma Realtor Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Sumeet Chadda
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Guleria
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2018
Puma Realtor Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Om Prakash
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Guleria
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2018
M/s Puma Realtors V/S Mrs. Mansi Khanna
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per report made by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.2 and 3, namely, Sh.Anupam Nagalia & Sh.Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given addresses. Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Pankaj Mahajan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajat Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.2 & 3, namely, Sh. Anupam Nagalia and Sh. Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given addresses. Today, in Court, Sh....
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ajay Nashikkar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.2 & 3, namely, Sh. Amrick Singh Gambhir and Sh. Anupam Nagalia, Directors of Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given addresses. Today, in Court, Sh. Roh...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Dr. Gurinder Singh Bholla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sahil Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors that payment towards 30% of the amount due already stood made. The said fact has not been disputed by the counsel for the decree holder. To discharge their liability, by way of full and final payment, two post-...
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sarabjeet Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:484 of 2017Date of Institution:13.06.2017Date of Decision:14.03.2018Sarabjeet Kaur w/o Khushwant Singh, resident of J-1809, Second Floor, C.R. Park, New Delhi – 110019, presently residing at H.N...
Case Number: 484
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.