Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. RAKTIM GOGOI & KARTIKEYA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2032 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 24/08/2017 in Complaint No. 199/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SH.RAJIV BHATIA. R/O. NO.5, DHAN...
Case Number: 2032
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2033 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 18/08/2017 in Complaint No. 219/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REP. SH. RAJIV BHATIA, SCO NO 6-8, FIST AND SECO...
Case Number: 2033
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2152 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 01/09/2017 in Complaint No. 243/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SH.RAJIV BHATIA. R/O. NO.5, DHAN...
Case Number: 2152
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate LEGACY LAW OFFICES,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1812 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 01/08/2017 in Complaint No. 202/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SH. RAJIV BHATIA. REGISTERED OFF...
Case Number: 1812
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the judgment debtors alongwith Sh. Manjit Singh, General Counsel have handed over two demand drafts bearing Nos.530511 & 530512, both dated 09.04.2018, in the sum of Rs.20,48,794/- each, to the Counsel for the decree holders ag...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikram Tandon,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.3 & 4, namely, Sh. Anupam Nagalia and Sh. Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. were not found present at the given addresses. Today in Court, Sh. R...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, judgment debtors No.3 to 5, namely, Sh. Anupam Nagalia, Sh. Shailendra Kumar Agrawal & Sh. Amrick Singh Gambhir, Directors of M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited were not found present at the giv...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 710
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one as and when occasion so arises. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for ...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SK AGRAWAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. SAGAR & SAGAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 782 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 02/03/2017 in Complaint No. 490/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI N...
Case Number: 782
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.