Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Sahil Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Cost of Rs.10000/- (imposed on 11.06.2018) has been deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account vide receipt in the sum of Rs.11000/-, which includes Rs.1000/- imposed in CC/108/2018 and Rs.10,000/- imposed in this case. Original receipt of Rs.11000/- is placed on record....
Case Number: 464
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Pankaj Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajat Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/475/2017( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2017 )InComplaint Case No. CC/309/20151. Pankaj GargChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd.Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Limited V/S Goldy Chadha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:711 of 2017Date of Institution:28.09.2017Date of Decision:12.07.2018Goldy Chadha aged about 41 S/o Sh.Gurcharan Singh Chadha permanent resident of 54 North Idgah Colony, Police Line, Agra at present r...
Case Number: 711
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Maninder singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:22 of 2018Date of Institution:12.01.2018Date of Decision:12.07.2018Maninder Singh son of Sh.Bhagwan Singh Khalsa, R/o # B1/152, Farmer Apptt., Rohini, Sector 13, New DelhiMs.Sukhbeer Kaur wife of Sh.M...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Raman Kumar Kalia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:783 of 2017Date of Institution:07.11.2017Date of Decision:12.07.2018Raman Kumar Kalia, S/o Sh.Sukhdev Raj Kalia, Corporate Planning, KNPC Head Office, P.O. Box-70, Ahmadi, Safat-13001, Kuwait.Rekha Ka...
Case Number: 783
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Satbir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gourav Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:833 of 2017Date of Institution:12.12.2017Date of Decision:12.07.2018Satbir Singh aged about 42 years S/o Sh.Paramjit Singh permanent R/o House No.283-C, Rajguru Nagar, Ludhiana, Punjab, now residing a...
Case Number: 833
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Brijinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:843 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:12.07.2018Brijinder Singh son of Sh.Bhagwan Singh Khalsa, R/o # B1/152, Farmer Apptt., Rohini, Sector 13, New DelhiMs.Sukhbeer Kaur wife of Sh...
Case Number: 843
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Prem Ojha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rameet Bakshi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that possession has already been delivered to the complainant during pendency of this complaint. The matter has been settled. It is stated by Sh. Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties that after mak...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Gautam Chawla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by Sh.Rohit Tanwar, AGM (Legal) of the Opposite Parties. Liberty granted. Acc...
Case Number: 810
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Ramesh Chander Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jaswinder Singh Bains, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rohit Tanwar, representative
Vide Agreement dated 29.08.2011, the complainant agreed to purchase the flat measuring 1609 sq. ft (super area) for an amount of Rs.52,81,319/-. Till the time of filing this complaint, the complainant had paid an amount of Rs.49,90,047/-. As per terms and conditions of the Buyer&...
Case Number: 762
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.