Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 710
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:8 of 2018Date of Institution:09.01.2018Date of Decision:24.08.2018Jitender Singh s/o Late Sh. Shishpal Singh, r/o Imtech Housing B-11, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u s1. ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:838 of 2017Date of Institution:13.12.2017Date of Decision:24.08.20181. Mr.Jaspreet Singh son of Sh. Kuldeep Singh.2. Ms. Amarjit Kaur wife of Mr. Kuldeep Singh.Residents of House no.2445, Sector 19-C,...
Case Number: 838
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:729 of 2017Date of Institution:10.10.2017Date of Decision:24.08.20181. Jatinder Sarin s/o Ratta Lal Sarin, r/o H.No.3159, Sector 19-D, Chandigarh.2. Rama Rajpal w/o Ved Rajpal, r/o H.No.1309, Sector 3...
Case Number: 729
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:122 of 2018Date of Institution:26.03.2018Date of Decision:24.08.20181. Arun Kumar Goel s/o Sh. Rajinder Kishore Goel.2. Parveen Goel w/o Arun Kumar Goel.Both residents of Mahabir Aluminum Ltd. Plot No...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:16 of 2018Date of Institution:10.01.2018Date of Decision:24.08.2018Rashim Rajpal s/o Ved Rajpal, H.No.1309, Sector 37-B, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u s1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rohit Tanwar, representative
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:483 of 2017Date of Institution:13.06.2017Date of Decision:24.08.2018Rajinder Dhupar S/o Sh. Hari Chand Capt. Resident of H.No.93, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana.……ComplainantV e r s u s1. ...
Case Number: 483
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:691 of 2017Date of Institution:12.09.2017Date of Decision:24.08.20181. Vikas Malik S/o Sh. Omparkash Malik r/o 101 Lengkong DUA 5 – (417742) Singapore.2. Sonia Malik W/o Sh. Vikas Malik, r/o 101...
Case Number: 691
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:57 of 2018Date of Institution:07.02.2018Date of Decision:24.08.20181. Mohit Sharma s/o Sh. J.K.Sharma r/o 30/104, Norwood Place, Station Road, Indooroopilly 4068, Queensland, Australia.2. Anju Bala W/...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 16.08.2018Date of decision:21.08.2018Complaint No. 590/2014IN THE MATTER OF:Sh. Ashok Kumar DiwanS/o Late Sh. Jiwan Lal DiwanC/o Diwan and Company,House no.2 (LGF),NRI...
Case Number: 590
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.