Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shiti Jain Dutt, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Commissio...
Case Number: 250
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anjali Moudgil, Daisy Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Commis...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the decree holders states that judgment, under execution, stands complied with except execution of sale deed and beyond that, decree holders have no grievance left against the judgment debtors. In view of statement made, this execution application stands disposed of h...
Case Number: 131
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 155
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Commis...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Commis...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In view of order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi in C.P.No.IB-934(PB)/2018 in the case titled as Mr.Paramjit Singh Saini & Ors. Vs. Puma Realtors Private Limited, this complaint is returned to the complainant to file it again, if...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv K. Bhatia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In view of order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi in C.P.No.IB-934(PB)/2018 in the case titled as Mr.Paramjit Singh Saini & Ors. Vs. Puma Realtors Private Limited and also on account of a fact that the complainant(s) had already f...
Case Number: 408
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.