Pspcl
Latest Judgments
Total 1222 Consumer Court Cases Against Pspcl.
PSPCL V/S Angrej Kaur
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Prretinderjeet Kaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 393 Instituted on: 03.06.2015 Decided on: 28.03.2016Angrej Kaur aged 55 years wife of Darshan Singh Ahluwalia, resident of VPO Mangwal, Near SPS School, Sangrur, Tehsil and District Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1....
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2016
Chairman PSPCL V/S Parkash Kaur
Court Name: Nawanshahr
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSHAHEED BHAGAT SINGH NAGARConsumer Complaint No. : 124 of 06.11.2015Date of Decision: : 18.03.2016Parkash Kaur wife of Hukum Singh, through Satwinder Singh attorney S/o of Hukum Singh R/o Opposite Soni Gas Agency, Balachaur-Chandigarh Roa...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
PSPCL V/S Monika Bansal
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri R.K.Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 595 Instituted on: 10.07.2015 Decided on: 18.03.2016Monika Bansal aged 42 years wife of Ashok Bansal son of Subash Chand, resident of Opposite B.D.O. Office, Patiala Road, Sunam, Tehsil Sunam, District Sangrur. .....
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
PSPCL V/S Rajinder Singh
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 90Date of Institution : 15.07.2015Date of Decision : 17.03.2016Rajinder Singh aged about 40 years s/o Kartar Singh, r/o Village Pakhi Kalan, Tehsil and District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Power C...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
PSPCL V/S Gurmeet Kaur
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri G.S. Nandpuri
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR.Complaint No. 802 Instituted on: 10.08.2015 Decided on: 17.03.2016Gurmeet Kaur wife of Harphool Singh, resident of Village Chathe Nanhera, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Punjab State Power Corporation Limi...
Case Number: 802
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
PSPCL V/S Sikander Singh
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri G.S. Nandpuri
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 803 Instituted on: 10.08.2015 Decided on: 17.03.2016Sikandar Singh son of Gurmeet Singh, resident of Village Chathe Nanhera, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Punjab State Power Corporation Li...
Case Number: 803
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
PSPCL V/S Hardev Singh
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri G.S. Nandpuri
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No.799 Instituted on: 10.08.2015 Decided on: 15.03.2016Hardev Singh son of Gurbax Singh, R/O Village Chatha Nanhera, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, The Ma...
Case Number: 799
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
PSPCL V/S Meharban Singh
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri G.S. Nandpuri
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 800 Instituted on: 10.08.2015 Decided on: 15.03.2016Meharban Singh son of Prem Singh, resident of Village Chatha Nanhera, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited...
Case Number: 800
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
Jaswinder Singh V/S PSPCL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sapan Dhir
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1298
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Balkaran Singh V/S PSPCL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sapan Dhir
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1299
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.