company-name-logo

Pspcl

Latest Judgments

Total 1222 Consumer Court Cases Against Pspcl.

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Lovely Bagi

Pspcl  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 235Date of Institution : 22.08.2016Date of Decision : 7.03.2017Lovely Bagi @ Reeta aged about 56 years w/o Vinod Kumar Bagi s/o Ram Parsad Bagi r/o Street No.3 ½ , Bhan Singh Colony, Ferozepur Road, Faridk...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 12-04-2018

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Baljit Kaur

Pspcl  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Satwir Singh

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/17/611. Baljit KaurBathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLBathinda............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Mohi...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2017

NCDRC

PSPCL & ANR. V/S HANS RAJ ARORA

Pspcl  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ALANKAR ARORA

Respondant Advocate MR. SATINDER S GULATI & MRS. KAMALDEEP GULATI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1392 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 03/03/2016 in Appeal No. 747/2013 of the State Commission Punjab)1. HANS RAJ ARORAR/O 38, SST NAGAR, SUNDR NAGAR, SCHEME NEAR SHIVA TEMPLE PATIALAPUNJAB...........P...

Case Number: 1392

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2017

Punjab

Jagrup Singh V/S PSPCL

Pspcl  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1194

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2017

Punjab

Baljit Kaur V/S PSPCL

Pspcl  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Meena Bansal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1072

|

Date of Filing: 30-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2017

Punjab

Bhagwan Singh V/S PSPCL

Pspcl  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manish Bansal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1675

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2017

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Sadiq Mohd

Pspcl  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate Sh Asheen Khan

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/16/351. Sadiq Mohds/o Bir Mohd. r/o Dhandial Road vill Patran patiala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLHead Office The Mall Patiala through its MDPatialaPunjab2. 2. The Assistant Executive Enginee...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2017

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Vinod Kumar

Pspcl  

Court Name: Barnala

Appelant Advocate D.R.Jindal

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/376/20161. Vinod KumarS/o Krishan Chand R/o H.No. B11/9 Kacca College Road BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCL1. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd The Mall Patiala through its Secretary.2.Assistant Executive Engineer ...

Case Number: 376

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-02-2017

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Tarsem Kumar

Pspcl  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 242Date of Institution : 29.08.2016Date of Decision : 6.02.2017Tarsem Kumar aged about 38 years s/o Sat Pal r/o House No.107 Balaji Colony, Faridkot, Tehsil and District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2017

Punjab

PSPCL V/S Amar Singh

Pspcl  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate Ranjit singh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 181/339Date of Institution : 1.08.2011/ 15.11.2016Date of Decision : 06.02.2017Amar Singh, aged about 58 years, s/o Mohinder Singh, r/o Guru Nanak Nagri, Hari Nau Road, Kotkapura, District Faridkot. ...Complainan...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 15-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.