Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. Manjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 935 1. Sujan Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. Manjit Singh, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 13 Sep 2...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. K K Jain
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 815 1. Gurumukh Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. K K Jain, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 12 Sep 20...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh.R S Mann
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 842 1. Gurnam Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh.R S Mann, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 12 Sep 2011 ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. K K Jain
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 865 1. Jagir Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. K K Jain, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 12 Sep 2011 ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 891 1. Somnath ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Inperson, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 12 Sep 2011 ORDER BE...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Tarun Sharma
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 874 1. Lal Chand ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Tarun Sharma, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 09 Sep 2011 O...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. K S Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 952 1. Jasbir Kaur ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. K S Sidhu, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 08 Sep 2011...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. K S Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 1032 1. Balwinder Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh. K S Sidhu, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 25 Aug...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate SH. A S Chahal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 868 1. Narinder Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :SH. A S Chahal, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 25 Aug ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ashok Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.P.S.Brar,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/198 1. Binder Paul Kaurw/o Bhupinder Singh Prop.Balaji filling station ,Baandi Tehsi...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.