Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S NAMITA SHARMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARAN SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Date of Instituion:13.03.2018 Date of final hearing:12.12.2022 Date of pronouncement: 03.02.2023Consumer Complaint No.140 of 2018IN THE MATTER OF1. Mrs. Namita Sharma w/o Sh. Shri Yogesh Kumar2. Yogesh Kumar S/o Sh....
Case Number: 140
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2023
ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S SARITA DEVI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARAN SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Date of Instituion:13.03.2018 Date of final hearing:12.12.2022 Date of pronouncement: 03.02.2023Consumer Complaint No.141 of 2018IN THE MATTER OFMrs. Sarita Devi W/o Sh. S.S. Chauhan, R/o House No.123/5, Saraswati S...
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2023
1. Brundavan Properties Pvt Ltd V/S Mr. N. Surendra Rao
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate Shaik Babu S
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2023
1 M/S EMPIRE PROPERTIES THROUGH ITS PARTNERS MR GURMUKH JANGALDAS SUKHWANI V/S 1 MR RAMKRISHNA VITTHAL KHARMALE
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate ADV NILESH BHANDARI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2022
Sri Avijit Sarkar Prop. of M/S. East West Properties & Ors. V/S Sri Tapan Kr. Dutta
Court Name: Hooghly
Appelant Advocate Sri Shibsankar Dhar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLYCC OF 2021PETITIONERVERSOPPOSITE PARTYExecution Application No. EA/28/2017( Date of Filing : 12 May 2017 )InComplaint Case No. CC/199/20131. Sri Tapan Kr. DuttaDhanbad, Jharkhand...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sri Avijit Sar...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2022
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd V/S Ravi Pratap
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Alok Kumar Mishra & Veerbahadur Srivastava
Respondant Advocate Manvendra pratap Singh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/310/2022( Date of Filing : 26 Apr 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/02/2021 in Case No. C/2009/740 of District Lucknow-I)1. Ravi PratapC/o Sunay...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2022
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2022
M/s A.N. Properties V/S C.K. Mohammed Tasleem Arief
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vandana P.L.
Respondant Advocate
01/08/2022The advocate for complainant files memo to withdraw the complaint and to present it before District Commission as the consideration amount paid for purchase of the property is less than Rs.50.00 lakhs. Hence, prays to return the complaint. In view of the memo, the compl...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2022
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2023
ANSAL PROPERTIES V/S SACHCHIDA NAND MISHRA
Court Name: Lucknow-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 252
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2022
ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD V/S LICHARAM
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate PREMSINGH PUNIA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 447
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2022
1)M/S INFRATECH PVT LTD . SEALINK PROPERTIES LANDS ONE WORLD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR 2) K.D RATHOD V/S MS.MADHURI DAYARAM SHARMA
Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane
Appelant Advocate ADV.AARTI SHINDE
Respondant Advocate
THANE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONRoom no. 428 and 429, Konkan Bhavan Annex Building, 4th Floor,C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614Complaint Case No. CC/22/136( Date of Filing : 11 Jul 2022 )1. MS.MADHURI DAYARAM SHARMAA/4,1-2 ,SAIKRUPA SOCIETY , SEC...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2022
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.