company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Telangana

1.M/S. MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD V/S 1.VIPUL KUMAR MISHRA

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate P.KESAVA RAO

Respondant Advocate B.RAVINDRA REDDY

First Appeal No. CC/38/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. 1.VIPUL KUMAR MISHRA79/A, EAST MARREDPALLY, SECUNDERABAD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERA...

Case Number: 38

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1Maytas Properties Limited,Rep.by.its.Managing Director,Whole-time director,Sri Byrraju Rama Raju, M V/S 1.Mr.Chennagowni Naveen Goud, S/o.Late Ch.Darshan Goud,Rep.by.hi GPA Holder -Cum-Brother Mr.Chennagowni.Anil Goud,S/o.Late Ch.Darshan Goud,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.M.Thirumal Rao,H.no.4-1-225/2A, Rajeev Nagar,

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/39/20111. 1.Mr.Chennagowni Naveen Goud, S/o.Late Ch.Darshan Goud,Rep.by.hi GPA Holder -Cum-Brother Mr.Chennagowni.Anil Goud,S/o.Late Ch.Darshan Goud,Presently R/o.2010 Apt-39,Latham Street, Mountain View, California-94040, USA,2. 2.Mrs.Chennagowni.Ramadevi, ...

Case Number: 39

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR V/S 1.MR.MAMIDI, NAVEEN,S/O.MR.PRAKASH RAO MAMIDI

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S.M.THIRUMAL RAO AND A.V.L.S.PRAKASH

Respondant Advocate

Caveat Cases No. CC/40/20111. 1.MR.MAMIDI, NAVEEN,S/O.MR.PRAKASH RAO MAMIDIAGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER2. 2.MRS.MAMIDI, ANANTHA LAKSHMI SARITHA1-2593/3/1, F.NO. B3, RAGHAVENDRA KRUPA APARTMENTGAGANMAHAL, HYDERABAD...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES ...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hill County (P)Ltd.rep. by its nominee V/S Godavarthi Naveen Kumar S/o.Mr.Namberumallu

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V.Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate K.Vishweshwar Reddy

Complaint Case No. CC/45/20101. Godavarthi Naveen Kumar S/o.Mr.NamberumalluR/o.3400, Richomond PKWY, Apartments #315, Richmond CA, 94806, USA, rep. by his GPA G.Namberumallu R/o.FLat no.7, Santosh Delux Apartments, Santosh Nagar Colony, Mehidipatnam, Hyderabad-500 084. BEFORE:HO...

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.M/s.Maytas Properties Limited, Rep.by.its.managing Director, Vimal Kishore Kaushik,6-3-1186/5/A, I V/S C.Manav, S/o.C.Bhskar Rao, R/o.Mountain view, California, USA, Rep.by GPA,Smt.C.Venkata Ramana, W/o.C.Bhaskar Rao,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Hamsa Raj, 3-5-780/11B, Besides Old M.L.A.Quarters,

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/51/20111. C.Manav, S/o.C.Bhskar Rao, R/o.Mountain view, California, USA, Rep.by GPA,Smt.C.Venkata Ramana, W/o.C.Bhaskar Rao,R/o.Penthouse, Nandanavanam, 24/A, Vengalrao Nagar, Hyderabad,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.M/s.Maytas Properties Limited, Rep.b...

Case Number: 51

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.M/s.Maytas Properties Limited, Rep.by.its.Managing Director,Mr.Arun K.Saha, Regd.Office at 6-3-118 V/S Mr.Lokesh Kumar Kosaraju, S/o.K.Venkateswara Rao,Rep.by.his G.P.A.Smt.K.Saraswathi,R/o.Flat No.83,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.Srinivas Karra, H.No.1-11-182, Flat No.101,"Kamala Palace"

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/53/20111. Mr.Lokesh Kumar Kosaraju, S/o.K.Venkateswara Rao,Rep.by.his G.P.A.Smt.K.Saraswathi,R/o.Flat No.83,Sandilya Towers, Poteneni Vari Street,Machavaram, Vijayawada,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.M/s.Maytas Properties Limited, Rep.by.its.Managing Di...

Case Number: 53

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD V/S 1.VIVEKANANDA RAO

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SRI S.NIRANJAN REDDY

Respondant Advocate SRI C NARESH REDDY

Complaint Case No. CC/54/20101. 1.VIVEKANANDA RAOHYDERABAD2. 2.K.PRASHANTHLIGH, KPHB COLONY, HYD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTDIII FLOOR, HYDERABAD.2. 3.M/S.HIMAGIRI BIO-TECH LTDHYD3. 4.M/S.SINDHU GREENLANDS LTDHYD4. 5.M/S.GOMAN AGRO FARMS LTDHYD5. 6.HIM...

Case Number: 54

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD V/S 1.MR.PENUBOLU VENKATRAM REDDY

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR.V.APPA RAO

Respondant Advocate SRI C NARESH REDDY

Complaint Case No. CC/55/20101. 1.MR.PENUBOLU VENKATRAM REDDYHYDERABAD2. 2.M/S.CHENNURU LAKSHMI PALLAVIHYDERABAD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTDIII FLOOR, HYDERABAD.2. 2.M/S.SWARNAMUKHI GREEN FIELDS LTDHYD3. 3.M/S.HIMAGIRI BIO-TECH LTDHYD4. 4.M/S.SINDHU G...

Case Number: 55

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.SOWMYA KATRAGADDA V/S M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/90/20101. M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD. CC  46  of 2010   1. Srinivas Gunti S/o.  Gunti Chandra...

Case Number: 90

|

Date of Filing: 10-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LIMITED V/S 1.VENKATESH GOVINDA SWAMY

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/91/20101. 1.VENKATESH GOVINDA SWAMY HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER  BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONAT HYDERABAD.  CC  67  of 2009     Between:&...

Case Number: 91

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.