Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.V.APPA RAO & MR.B.SRINIVAS
Respondant Advocate K.VISHNU REDDY
First Appeal No. CC/84/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. NEGA VINAY REDDYMIG B-36,DR.A.S. RAO NAGAR,ECIL,HYDERABAD-62...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTDIII FLOOR,AMOGH PLAZA,BEGUMPET,HYDERABAD-500016.A.P2. 2.MR.M.THEJA PRA...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KOKA SATYANARAYANA
Respondant Advocate K.V.SHEKHAR REDDY
Complaint Case No. CC/85/20101. SIMPSON ANANTH RATHNARAJR/O 404,VENKATA SAI NILAYAM,BHRAMMANWADI,SECUNDERABAD.2. ROOPA ANANTHR/O 404,VENKATA SAI NILAYAM,BHRAMANWADI,SECUNDERABAD............Complainant(s)Versus1. MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD,REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,MR.B.RAMA RAJUHI...
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.V.APPA RAO & MR.B.SRINIVAS
Respondant Advocate K.VISHNU REDDY
First Appeal No. CC/86/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. SATHIS KUMAR MURUGESAN101,BHARANI RESIDENCY, NOVOTEL HOTEL ROAD, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD-500033...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTDIII FLOOR,AMOGH PLAZA,BEGUMPET,HYDERABA...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/88/20101. M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD. CC  46  of 2010   1. Srinivas Gunti S/o.  Gunti Chandra...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/89/20101. M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD. CC 13  of 2010 Between: 1. Bharati Khurana, D/o. Ramesh Chander Khurana, 2. ...
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/90/20101. M/S.MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD. CC  46  of 2010   1. Srinivas Gunti S/o.  Gunti Chandra...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.SRIPADA PRABHAKAR
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/91/20101. 1.VENKATESH GOVINDA SWAMY HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER  BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONAT HYDERABAD.  CC  67  of 2009     Between:&...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate K.VISHWER REDDY
Complaint Case No. CC/92/20101. 1.SRINIVAS PANYALA HYD BEFORE:HON'ABLE MS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD CC   117  of 2010 Between: Sanjay Thota, S/o.  T. Anil Kumar R/o. Fla...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.V.Appa Rao
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/94/20101. Mrs.S.Radha, W/o.Mr.Seshidhar Reddy,R/o.1/A, Rajasree Apartments, H.No.539/MIG, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1M/s.Mytas Properties Limited, Mr.M.Theja Pratap Raju, S/o.Mr.Hari Prasad Raju,O/o.6-3-1186/5/A, III Floor, Amogh ...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/94/20111. Mr.Kambram Maheshwara Reddy S/o Suryanarayana, aged 34 yrs., Occ:Software engineer,H.No.4-35/438/1, Flat No.302, AJM Towers, Madhavaram nagar colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maytas properties rep, by its MD. BBachupal...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.