company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Karnataka

M/s. Golden Gate Properties Ltd V/S 1. Mr. Gopal Jagadish Purohit S/o. Mr. Jagadish T. Purohit Aged about 41 Years 2.Mrs. Bhavana Gopal Purohit W/o. Mr. Gopal Jagadish Purohit Aged about 40 Years

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate M/s. Udya Shankar Associates

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/16761. 1. Mr. Gopal Jagadish Purohit S/o. Mr. Jagadish T. Purohit Aged about 41 Years 2.Mrs. Bhavana Gopal Pu...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

M/s. Golden Gate Properties Ltd V/S Mr. Praveen Jangira S/o. Mr. B. L. Jangira Aged about 36 Years 2.Smt. Meera Jangira W?o. Mr. Praveen Jangira Aged about 35 Years

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate M/s. Uday Shankar Associates

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/16741. Mr. Praveen Jangira S/o. Mr. B. L. Jangira Aged about 36 Years 2.Smt. Meera Jangira W?o. Mr. Praveen J...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-01-1970

Karnataka

M/s. Chaitanya Properties Pvt Ltd V/S 1.Mr. A. Dhananjaya Aged 50 Yers 2. Mrs. Sudha Dhananjaya Age 48 years

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Shobha Bhavikatti

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/15151. 1.Mr. A. Dhananjaya Aged 50 Yers 2. Mrs. Sudha Dhananjaya Age 48 years Both are R/at . Flat No. 57 Sun...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/s Chamber properties prv.Ltd. V/S Mrs.Kona Rajeshwari Nayudu

Properties  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate Umesh Dehpande

Respondant Advocate Raviraj Bhosale

Complaint Case No. CC/06/861. Mrs.Kona Rajeshwari NayuduA-502,Acacia,forest Castied off main rd.koregaonpark, pune 36...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Chamber properties prv.Ltd.B/G-4,Konark Estate pune, ii)Esplance school building 160,D.N. Road,Fort Mumbai-01............Opp....

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

USHA DUA V/S M/S. RAJENDRAS PROPERTIES & INDUSTIRES

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH AGGRWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. D.R. JUNEJA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 558 OF 2012 IN RP/3364/20081. M/S. RAJENDRAS PROPERTIES & INDUSTIRES...........Appellants(s)Versus1. USHA DUA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEM...

Case Number: 558

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2012

NCDRC

HARISH KUMAR GOYAL V/S M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate MR. R.D. NAKHEEJA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3092 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 24/03/2009 in Appeal No. 973/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.115, Ansal Bhawan . 16, kasturba Gandhi Marg . New Del...

Case Number: 3092

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2012

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Vikas Malik

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Mr. Sandeep K sharma, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 378 of 2012 1. Vikas Maliks/o Dr. Vinod Malil H.No. 4963, Pancham Society, Block D, Sector 68, Mohali ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Ansal Properties...

Case Number: 378

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

M/s. Ittina Properties Pvt Ltd V/S Sri. Amar Yashwanth S/o. Amaresh Gejje, Aged about 21 Years

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate K. Somasekhar Reddy

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/7671. Sri. Amar Yashwanth S/o. Amaresh Gejje, Aged about 21 Years Residing at No. 20, 'Basava Nilaya, 7th Cro...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

M/S APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., V/S MANOJ NARAYANAN

Apple   Properties  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate K.S.DILIP

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/11/2881. MANOJ NARAYANANS/O S.NARAYANAN, SREEPADAM, KAILASH NAGAR, KALPATHY, PALAKKAD - 678 003, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MAHESH NARAYANAN, S/O S.NARAYANAN, SREEPADAM, KAILASH NAGAR, KAL...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 04-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

M/S APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PVT.LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR K.A.SAJU V/S LATHA RAMACHANDRAN

Apple   Apple   Properties  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate M.V.JOY

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/51. LATHA RAMACHANDRANW/O T.P.RAVIKUMAR, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT NANDANAM, HARISREE COLONY, VADAKKANTHARA P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN: 678 012PALAKKADERNAKULAM2. T.P.RAVIKUMARS/O P.P.ACHUTHA PISHARADY,...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 04-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.