Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
1. M/s.Maytas Properties Ltd, V/S Mrs. Pathai Ramakrishnan Vidyalakshmi W/o Mr. Balasubramanian Raju
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.V.Gourisankara Rao
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/79/091. Mrs. Pathai Ramakrishnan Vidyalakshmi W/o Mr. Balasubramanian RajuFlat No.302,Manju Enclave, Near Sarada high School, Kondapur, Hyderabad -500 032HyderabadAndhra Pradesh2. Balasubramanian Raju S/o. balasubramanian, aged 32 years , Indian, occ: servic...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Suchir India properties (P) Ltd., A company corportated under me Indian Companies Act. having of V/S Manoj Pradhan S/o kameshwara Pradhan aged 33 yrs., Occ:Pvt. employee,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.R.Vinod Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s Gopi Rajesh Associates
Complaint Case No. CC/8/20111. Manoj Pradhan S/o kameshwara Pradhan aged 33 yrs., Occ:Pvt. employee, R/o 401, MT SAnthoshi apartments, Mayuri Marg, Begumpet, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Suchir India properties (P) Ltd., A company corportated under me Indian Com...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Suchir India properties (P) Ltd., A company corportated under me Indian Companies Act. having of V/S Manoj Pradhan S/o kameshwara Pradhan aged 33 yrs., Occ:Pvt. employee,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.R.Vinod Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s Gopi Rajesh Associates
Complaint Case No. CC/8/20111. Manoj Pradhan S/o kameshwara Pradhan aged 33 yrs., Occ:Pvt. employee, R/o 401, MT SAnthoshi apartments, Mayuri Marg, Begumpet, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Suchir India properties (P) Ltd., A company corportated under me Indian Com...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Ittina Properties Private Ltd. V/S Seema Ranjan
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Triveni P.C.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/11/16001. Seema RanjanW/o Ramesh Kumar Rauniar,aged about 31 years2. 2.Ramesh Kumar RauniarS/o Late Moti Chand R...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S AVJ PROPERTIES PVT.LTD V/S MERCY BISSY JOSEPH
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate GEORGE CHERIYAN KARIPPAPARAMBIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/10/5561. MERCY BISSY JOSEPHD/O T.J.JOSEPH, RESIDING AT THUNDIPARAMBIL HOUSE, OCHANTHURUTH.P.O.,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S AVJ PROPERTIES PVT.LTDM/S AVJ PROPERTIES PVT.LTD, 2ND FLOOR,SMP COMPLEX,...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Kajaria Investment & Properties Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sujit Bose.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ruma Das Maity.
Respondant Advocate Kh. Aftabuddin
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGALBHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027CC NO. 22 Of 20111. Sujit Bose.Flat No.12, 28B, Rowland Road, Kolkata - 700 020.2. Sri C.P. ShahFlat No.18, 28B, Rowland Road, Kolkata - 700 020.3. Tulsi Chakraba...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Properties Rajshree Computers V/S Renukumar
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1324
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2022
ANSLA PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. V/S PUSHPANJALI FAEM OWNERS & RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSN.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUSUYA SALWAN
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. SURI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 195 OF 19951. PUSHPANJALI FAEM OWNERS & RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSN.RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION . BIJWASAN C-31, PUSHPANJALI FARMS . BIJWASAN ROAD NEW DELHI 110061............Complainant(s)Versus1. ANSLA PROPERTIES ...
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-1995
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2012
G. KESHAV RAJ V/S M/S. STERLING ESTATES AND PROPERTIES LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. A. PRASANNA VENKAT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1868 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Appeal No. 350/2011 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. M/S. STERLING ESTATES AND PROPERTIES LTD.By its Managing Director, R/o T-3 Temple Bell, Sout...
Case Number: 1868
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2012
M/s. Golden Gate properties Ltd V/S Mr.Naresh Kumar S/o Mr.MohanLal Aged about 34 years 2. Mrs.Kavitha Verma W/o Mr.Naresh KumarAged about 29 yrs
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate M/s Uday Shankar Associates
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/16751. Mr.Naresh Kumar S/o Mr.MohanLal Aged about 34 years 2. Mrs.Kavitha Verma W/o Mr.Naresh KumarAged about...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.