company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Chandigarh

Indu Dhir V/S Ansal Properties & Infrastruture Ltd.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh.Vaibhav Narang Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra, Adv. for the respondent

FA No: 410 Of 2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Ansal Properties & Infrastruture Ltd.1202-04 Antriksh Bhawan 22, Kastuba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 through its Managing Director2. Ansal Properties & Infrastruture Ltd.Regional office SCO No.183-184...

Case Number: 410

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd, V/S Prem Chand Guru

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 503 of 2012 1. Prem Chand Guru# 2165/2, Sector 45/C, Chandigarh. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 19 Feb 2013 ORDER DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH...

Case Number: 503

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1.21st Century Investment and Properties Private Limited, Plot no.18, Vertex Privilege, Nizampet Roa V/S Mr.Rajinikant Codavalli, S/o.C.S.Madanmohan,Rep.by.father/GPA holder,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mrs.J.Sudnyata Deepak, Flat no.72, Krupa Deep Apartments, Asha Officers Colony, R.K.Puram,

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/58/20111. Mr.Rajinikant Codavalli, S/o.C.S.Madanmohan,Rep.by.father/GPA holder,R/o.H.No.33-94, Plot No.70/A, RTC Colony, Trimulgerry, Secunderabad-3...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.21st Century Investment and Properties Private Limited, Plot no.18, Vertex...

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1.21st Century Investment and Properties Private Limited, Plot no.18, Vertex Privilege, Nizampet Roa V/S Mr.Rajinikant Codavalli, S/o.C.S.Madanmohan,Rep.by.father/GPA holder,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mrs.J.Sudnyata Deepak, Flat no.72, Krupa Deep Apartments, Asha Officers Colony, R.K.Puram,

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/58/20111. Mr.Rajinikant Codavalli, S/o.C.S.Madanmohan,Rep.by.father/GPA holder,R/o.H.No.33-94, Plot No.70/A, RTC Colony, Trimulgerry, Secunderabad-3...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.21st Century Investment and Properties Private Limited, Plot no.18, Vertex...

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S SANJANA PROPERTIES PVT LTD V/S GANGES CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

Properties   Society  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SMT S SONAWANE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/2211. GANGES CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD 17 BANGANGA CROSS LANE WALKESHWAR ROAD MUMBAI -400006MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SANJANA PROPERTIES PVT ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

M/S. RAVINDERA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. V/S M/S. YOGESHWAR NATH H.U.F.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL DUTT DIXIT & ANAND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. K.N. JAYASANKAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 127 OF 20031. M/S. YOGESHWAR NATH H.U.F. THROUGH ITS KARTA SH. YOGESHWAR NATH S/O. SH. SRI NATHR/O. 36 HANUMAN ROADNEW DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAVINDERA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.02 TILAK MAR...

Case Number: 127

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2003

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2013

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited V/S Indhu Dhir

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 14 of 2013 1. Indhu Dhir ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 23 Jan 2013 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTR...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S KANAKIA PROPERTIES PVT LTD V/S SHRI JASPINDER SINGH PADAM

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3991. SHRI JASPINDER SINGH PADAMR/O B-12 KAILAS PARK CHIRAG NAGAR GHATKOPAR MUMBAI 400086MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA 2. SHRI RAJESH KANAKIA349 BUSINESS POINT 5 TH FLOOR W...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI JASPINDER SINGH PADAM V/S M/S KANAKIA PROPERTIES PVT LTD

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A V PATWARDHAN

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/3991. SHRI JASPINDER SINGH PADAMR/O B-12 KAILAS PARK CHIRAG NAGAR GHATKOPAR MUMBAI 400086MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA 2. SHRI RAJESH KANAKIA349 BUSINESS POINT 5 TH FLOOR W...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Delhi

ANSAL PROPERTIES V/S PRAYAG RAJ

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, DELHI -110092DELHI EASTComplaint Case No. CC/915/20121. PRAYAG RAJC-231 VIVEK VIHAR PJASE-1 DELHI-95...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ANSAL PROPERTIES1202-04 12 FLOOR ANTRIKSH BHAWAN 22 KG MARG DELHI-01............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON...

Case Number: 915

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.