Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2013 IN RP/180/20131. JOGESH MAKHIJA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHO...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/11/1491. S.Rajagopal Son of late R. Srinivasa RaghavanAged 66 Years and residing at Plot No. 108, IV Stre...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/11/1501. Vijaykumar Raja Gopal Son of S.Rajagopal Aged 37 Years R/p by its General Power of Attorney, S. ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Ansal Properties Properties Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUGAN C. AGGARWAL & SHARDA GARG
Respondant Advocate MR DALIP MEHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 261 OF 2011 WITH IA/4749/20131. BOARER SECURITY FORCE CO-OP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.Through Its Secretary Sh. Rajesh Puri, Valley View Estate, Gawal Pahari Faridabad Road,Gurgaon Haryana ...........Co...
Case Number: 261
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DALIP MEHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2858 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/06/2013 in Appeal No. 253/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS, SH.VIKAS...
Case Number: 2858
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DALIP MEHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2013 IN FA/413/20131. M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. VAISHALI VERMA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 287
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH , MR. VINOD PANDEY & MR. SANJEEV MANCHANDA
Respondant Advocate MS. PRITHA SRIKUMAR IYER, MR. T.V.S.R. SREYAS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3222-3223 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 416-417/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy R/o 502,5th floor Uniworth Pearl Apts Opp ...
Case Number: 3222
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH & MR. VINOD PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4503-4505 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/04/2012 in Appeal No. 356/2012, 357/2012 & 358/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy, R/o No-502,5th floor, Un...
Case Number: 4503
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH, MR. VINOD PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4524 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/10/2011 in Appeal No. 3353/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy, R/o No-502, 5th floo, Uniworth Pearl Apts, Opp Sh...
Case Number: 4524
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAGHENTH BASANT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/07/2013 in Complaint No. 25/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD.(FORMERLY MAYTAS HILL COUNTRY PVT LTD.)THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATOR...
Case Number: 629
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.