company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

NCDRC

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR. V/S JOGESH MAKHIJA

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2013 IN RP/180/20131. JOGESH MAKHIJA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHO...

Case Number: 388

|

Date of Filing: 18-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-10-2013

Karnataka

M/s Granity Properties Private ltd a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, V/S S.Rajagopal Son of late R. Srinivasa Raghavan

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/11/1491. S.Rajagopal Son of late R. Srinivasa RaghavanAged 66 Years and residing at Plot No. 108, IV Stre...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 10-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

M/s Granity Properties Pvt Ltd a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, Carrying on bu V/S Vijaykumar Raja Gopal Son of S.Rajagopal Aged 37 Years R/p by its General Power of Attorney, S. Rajagopal

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/11/1501. Vijaykumar Raja Gopal Son of S.Rajagopal Aged 37 Years R/p by its General Power of Attorney, S. ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 10-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. V/S BOARER SECURITY FORCE CO-OP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.

Ansal Properties   Properties   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUGAN C. AGGARWAL & SHARDA GARG

Respondant Advocate MR DALIP MEHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 261 OF 2011 WITH IA/4749/20131. BOARER SECURITY FORCE CO-OP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.Through Its Secretary Sh. Rajesh Puri, Valley View Estate, Gawal Pahari Faridabad Road,Gurgaon Haryana ...........Co...

Case Number: 261

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-10-2013

NCDRC

SANJAY GUPTA & 2 ORS. V/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DALIP MEHRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2858 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/06/2013 in Appeal No. 253/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS, SH.VIKAS...

Case Number: 2858

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-10-2013

NCDRC

VAISHALI VERMA V/S M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DALIP MEHRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2013 IN FA/413/20131. M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. VAISHALI VERMA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHO...

Case Number: 287

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2013

NCDRC

T. S. SUBRAMANIAM & 2 ORS. V/S M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIES

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH , MR. VINOD PANDEY & MR. SANJEEV MANCHANDA

Respondant Advocate MS. PRITHA SRIKUMAR IYER, MR. T.V.S.R. SREYAS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3222-3223 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 416-417/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy R/o 502,5th floor Uniworth Pearl Apts Opp ...

Case Number: 3222

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2013

NCDRC

KIRTI KUNAL SETHI & 7 ORS. V/S M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIES

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH & MR. VINOD PANDEY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4503-4505 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/04/2012 in Appeal No. 356/2012, 357/2012 & 358/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy, R/o No-502,5th floor, Un...

Case Number: 4503

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2013

NCDRC

NEERAJ SHARMA & 4 ORS. V/S M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIES

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWIN VAISH, MR. VINOD PANDEY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4524 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/10/2011 in Appeal No. 3353/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. ORANGE PROPERTIESS/o Shri R.S Murthy, R/o No-502, 5th floo, Uniworth Pearl Apts, Opp Sh...

Case Number: 4524

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2013

NCDRC

NIKHIL PENMETSA & 5 ORS. V/S MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAGHENTH BASANT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/07/2013 in Complaint No. 25/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MAYTAS PROPERTIES LTD.(FORMERLY MAYTAS HILL COUNTRY PVT LTD.)THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATOR...

Case Number: 629

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.