Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
M/s Shubban Properties Mr. Rajeshkumar Naupatlal Sakla, V/S 1.Mrs. Pallavi Madhukarrao Gainewar,
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Revati Kale
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1811. 1.Mrs. Pallavi Madhukarrao Gainewar,C/o Sachin Gainewar, S. No. 157, Flat No. E 6, Laxmi Puram Yerwada, Pune 7PuneMaharashtra 2. 2. Madhukarrao Gangaramji Gainewar, Madhuban, Bhande Plot, Umrer Road, Nagpur NagpurMaharashtra ...........Complainant(s...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sh. S.S.Walia V/S M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastrurure Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Bahrdwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Revision Petition No. RP/37/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastrurure Ltd.New Delhi BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Makkar Properties V/S Jaspreet kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.M.S.Saini Adv.
Respondant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Complaint Case No. CC/65/20131. Jaspreet kaurChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Makkar Properties thrugh its owner kaniya Lal Makkar of Makkar Properties office at 1360, Sector-22/B, Chandigarh2. M/s Taneja Developers & Infrastruture LimitedCompanyThrough its Managing Di...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ANMOL DAR V/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT PAHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 804 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/08/2013 in Complaint No. 214/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/7314/2013,IA/7315/20131. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.115, ANSAL BHAWAN, 16, KASTURB...
Case Number: 804
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2013
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.Chennagowni Naveen Goud S/o late Darshan Goud, 32 yrs., Occ:pvt. service, Rep. by GPA Holder, Mr.Chennagowni Anil Goud, S/o late Darshan Goud, age 30 yrs.,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy
Execution Application No. EA/17/20121. Mr.Chennagowni Naveen Goud S/o late Darshan Goud, 32 yrs., Occ:pvt. service, Rep. by GPA Holder, Mr.Chennagowni Anil Goud, S/o late Darshan Goud, age 30 yrs.,R/o 4-8-38/2, hayatnagar, Hydeabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Maytas Properties...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.Mamidi Naveen S/o Mr.Prakash Rao, 37 yrs., and mrs. Mamidi Anantha Lakshmi Saritha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy
Execution Application No. EA/18/20121. Mr.Mamidi Naveen S/o Mr.Prakash Rao, 37 yrs., and mrs. Mamidi Anantha Lakshmi Sarithaboth are R/o 1-2-593/3/1, F.No.B3, Raghavendra Krupa Apartments, Gaganmahal, Hyderabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M....
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.Kambam Maheswar Reddy S/o Mr.K.Suryanarayana Reddy, 34 yrs., software engineer and Mrs. B.kavitha REp. GPA holder Mr.Sudhakar Ragela S/o R.narayana Swamy, 36 yrs., occ:Employee,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy ? OP1
Execution Application No. EA/19/20121. Mr.Kambam Maheswar Reddy S/o Mr.K.Suryanarayana Reddy, 34 yrs., software engineer and Mrs. B.kavitha REp. GPA holder Mr.Sudhakar Ragela S/o R.narayana Swamy, 36 yrs., occ:Employee,R/o 4-35-438/1, Flat No. 302, AJM Towers, madhavaram nagar Co...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.Y.Sreenivas S/o Mr.Y.Venkataswamy, 43 yrs., Occ:Employee and Mrs. Y.Neeraja Sreenivas W/o Mr.Y.Srinivas
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy ? OP1
Execution Application No. EA/20/20121. Mr.Y.Sreenivas S/o Mr.Y.Venkataswamy, 43 yrs., Occ:Employee and Mrs. Y.Neeraja Sreenivas W/o Mr.Y.Srinivasboth are R/.o Flat No. 407 A block, Vertex pleasant Apartment, Brindavan Colony, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyd............Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.Garapaty B.K.Prasad S/o G.Suryanarayana, 51 yrs., Pvt. Service,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy ? OP1
Execution Application No. EA/21/20121. Mr.Garapaty B.K.Prasad S/o G.Suryanarayana, 51 yrs., Pvt. Service,R/o C-423, Krishna Apartments Ameerpet cross roads, Hyderabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Ra...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju, V/S Mr.T.Srinivasan S/o Thirugnanasambandam, 39 yrs, Occ:Pvt. Service
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.M.Thirumal Rao
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Visweswara Reddy ? OP1
Execution Application No. EA/22/20121. Mr.T.Srinivasan S/o Thirugnanasambandam, 39 yrs, Occ:Pvt. ServiceR/o 7-1-3-B-407, Shanthibagh Apartmetns, Begumpet, Hyderabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its M.D. Whole time Director, Sri. Byrraju Rama Raju...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.