company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3633 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

NCDRC

R. SURESH & ANR. V/S M/S. ASHED PROPERTIES & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI MIDHA

Respondant Advocate MR. S.N. BHATT

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Complaint No. 1355/2006 of the State Commission None)1. M/S. ASHED PROPERTIES & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.154/1, Wheeler RoadBangalore - 560 005...........Appellan...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2014

Rajasthan

ANSHAL PROPERTIES V/S MAHENDRA SINGH VARMA

Properties  

Court Name: Jaipur-I

Appelant Advocate OMPRAKASH SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 922

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2015

NCDRC

MAHESH K.R. & ORS. V/S LTTINA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VISHWANATH BHANDARKAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3113-3115 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/12/2007 in Appeal No. 2643-2645/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. LTTINA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.NO.1054, 7TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 3...

Case Number: 3113

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 24-07-2014

NCDRC

BLUE VALLEY PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. V/S VENKATESH UPPALA

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SRIDHAR RAO U

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3596 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 25/06/2013 in Appeal No. 62/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. VENKATESH UPPALAS/O SRIDHARAAO UPPALA, R/AT 2216 D, BLOCK , 16TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN SAHAKARNAGAR,...

Case Number: 3596

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-07-2014

West Bengal

Poonam Pandey, M/s. Triyash Projects And Properties V/S Subho Ghosh

Properties  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/1961. Subho Ghosh95A, Kankulia Road, Kolkata-700029.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Poonam Pandey, M/s. Triyash Pro...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (Formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hills County (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Ma V/S Konda Prashant S/o. K.Umakanth Reddy, Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by its GPA Mr. K. Umakanth Reddy S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about 55 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V.Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate M/s K. Visweswar Reddy ? OP1 & OP2

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADExecution Application No. EA/34/2013In1. Konda Prashant S/o. K.Umakanth Reddy, Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by its GPA Mr. K. Umakanth Reddy S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about 55 Years,R/o. Plot No. 10, Green ...

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1.M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hills Country (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S Mr. Busani Rajsekhara Reddy, S/o. Mr. Ram Reddy, Aged about 35 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. B.Ram Reddy, S/o. Mr. Yella Reddy Aged about 67 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate Mr. K.Visweswar Reddy ?O.P1 & 2

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADExecution Application No. EA/40/2013In1. Mr. Busani Rajsekhara Reddy, S/o. Mr. Ram Reddy, Aged about 35 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. B.Ram Reddy, S/o. Mr. Yella Reddy Aged about 67 Years,R/o. H.No.17-1-382/B/87, Bh...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerly known as M/s Maytas Hill Country (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S Uma Kanmanth Reddy, W/o. Vijay Kanmanth Reddyaged about 52 Years, Rep. by GPA V. Sucharitha Rao, W/o. H.No.502, Shyamlal Building,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visesweswar Reddy -Op1

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADExecution Application No. EA/72/2013In1. Uma Kanmanth Reddy, W/o. Vijay Kanmanth Reddyaged about 52 Years, Rep. by GPA V. Sucharitha Rao, W/o. H.No.502, Shyamlal Building,Jaya Enclave, Begumpet, Hyderabad-500...

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1 Maytas Properties Limited V/S 1 Bharathi Khurana

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M s PrabhakarSripada

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADExecution Application No. EA/86/2013In1. 1 Bharathi Khurana M/s. PrabhakarSripada BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Gopala Krishna Tamada PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member For the Appellant:For...

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (Formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hills County (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Ma V/S Konda Prashant S/o. K.Umakanth Reddy, Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by its GPA Mr. K. Umakanth Reddy S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about 55 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V.Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate M/s K. Visweswar Reddy ? OP1 & OP2

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADExecution Application No. EA/34/2013In1. Konda Prashant S/o. K.Umakanth Reddy, Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by its GPA Mr. K. Umakanth Reddy S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about 55 Years,R/o. Plot No. 10, Green ...

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.