Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
Ansal Properties V/S Geeta Sudha
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate L.D MAdan
Respondant Advocate Rahul Tanwar
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
Ansal Properties V/S Krishna ranga
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate Mohti goel
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Ansal Properties V/S Ashok Verma
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Amit Gupta
Respondant Advocate Rahul Tanwar
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2016
Ansal properties V/S Devender singh
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Taroon sethi
Respondant Advocate Mohit goel
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
ARUN KAPOOR V/S VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 24.02.2016Date of Decision: 01.03.2016First Appeal No. 101/2011(Arising out of the order dated 07.02.2011 passed in Complaint Case No. 267/2010 by the District Con...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2016
Marg Properties Ltd., V/S Lawarance Gunasekar
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate M/s.Dr.G.Krishnamurthy
Respondant Advocate B.R.Shankaralingam
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)Complaint Case No. CC/269/20141. Lawarance GunasekarAdyar Chn-20............Complainant(s)Versus1. Marg Properties Ltd.,Kottivakam Chn -41.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT For the Compla...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2016
AIPRO CITY TOWNSHIP PROPERTIES V/S Mr.N. Murali S/o Mr.Rajeshekar aged about 46 years
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/2190/20141. Mr.N. Murali S/o Mr.Rajeshekar aged about 46 years Residig at 1964, Harshagiri, 9th Main, K.S Layout, 2nd stage Bangalore-5600782. Vani w/o Mr. N.Murali aged 39 yearsResidig at 1964, Harshagiri, 9th Main, K.S Layout, 2nd stage Ba...
Case Number: 2190
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2016
Silver Hills Properties (P) Ltd V/S Thomas Tharakan
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.N.O.Inasu
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/15/786( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2015 )1. Thomas Tharakans/o Tharakan Kochappu,Theerakan House,Thrissur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Silver Hills Properties (P) LtdMalgudi Days Building,Thrissur rep by ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2022
1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., Rep. by its Vice Chairman Maytas Hill Country Project-Bachupally Miy V/S Nikhil Penmetsa, S/o. Mr. P. Bhaskara Raju, Aged 33 Years, Occ: Employee, Presently R/o. 1254, Deffor Village, NW 234, Atlanta, GA-30318, USA Permanented R/o. H.No.8-3-677/45 S.K.D. Nagar,Yellareddyga
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.G.Narender Raj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/10/2014In1. Nikhil Penmetsa, S/o. Mr. P. Bhaskara Raju, Aged 33 Years, Occ: Employee, Presently R/o. 1254, Deffor Village, NW 234, Atlanta, GA-30318, USA Permanented R/o. H.No.8-3-677/45 S.K.D. Nagar,Yel...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2016
1 M S Maytas Properties Ltd V/S 1 Mr Sudharakar Kasireddy
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M s Gouri shankara rao
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/31/2014In1. 1 Mr Sudharakar KasireddySon of Suryanarayana Kasireddy aged about 45 yrs Occ Software Engineer Residence of 10663 Water Cress LN FRISCO TX 75034 USA2. 2 Mrs Sreevani Kasireddy Wife of Sudhak...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.