Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
Agarwal Properties & Colonizers V/S Doli Kumari
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kaliash narayn Pareek
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2019
TOSHIBA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., V/S M/S. EVERSHINE SAPPHIRE C.H.S. LTD,
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate R.K. NAIK
Respondant Advocate Mr.Durgaprasad S Sabnis & Miss Nidhi Doshi
Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban DistrictAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/12/631. M/S. EVERSHINE SAPPHIRE C.H.S. LTD,CHANDIVALI FARM ROAD, CHANDIVALI, KURLA WEST, MUMBAI-72............Complainant(...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Surender Singh S/o Om Parkash
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate K.C. Dalal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2017
1.Maytas Properties Limited, Regd. Office at Maytas Properties Limited, Hill Country, Bachupally, Mi V/S Mr. Rajeswar V. Surabhi, S/o. Mr. S. Thirupathi Rao, Aged about 39 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. 42890, Conquest Circle, Ashburn VA, 20148, USA.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Prabhakar Sripada
Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy-OP1
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/244/20131. Mr. Rajeswar V. Surabhi, S/o. Mr. S. Thirupathi Rao, Aged about 39 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. 42890, Conquest Circle, Ashburn VA, 20148, USA.2. Rep. by her GPA hoder Mr. B. Purshotahm Rao, S/...
Case Number: 244
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Mr. Hardeep Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Inderpal Singh Bhinder, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:422 of 2016Date of Institution:03.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Mr. Hardeep Singh son of Ravinder Pal Singh resident of House No.3451, Sector 45-D, Chandigarh (through his General Power of Attorne...
Case Number: 422
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Ansal Properties & Inrastructure Ltd. V/S Som Dutt Verma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhashish Kukreti,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:496 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:08.02.2017Som Dutt Verma S/o Lt. Des Raj,Deepak Verma S/o Sh. Som Dutt Verma,Both residents of Ward No.6, Main Bazar, Balachaur, District SBS ...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
1.Maytas Properties Limited, Regd. Office at Maytas Properties Limited, Hill Country, Bachupally, Mi V/S 1. Mrs K. Mrudula, W/o. B. Uttam Kumar Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. 89-A, Ferry Street, Floor-II, Jersey City, New Jesrsey-07307, U.S.A.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Prabhakar Sripada
Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy- OP1
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/243/20131. 1. Mrs K. Mrudula, W/o. B. Uttam Kumar Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. 89-A, Ferry Street, Floor-II, Jersey City, New Jesrsey-07307, U.S.A.2. 2. Mr. B. Uttam Kumar, S/o. Mr. B. Pursh...
Case Number: 243
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Omkar Properties V/S Tukaram Chandrasen Shelake,
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Smt. Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2017
Megestic Properties Pvt, Ltd. V/S V.K. Bansal
Court Name: Jaipur-IV
Appelant Advocate B.C. Rawat
Respondant Advocate Vineet Mehta
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Megestic Properties Pvt, Ltd. V/S Sundip Keshvani
Court Name: Jaipur-IV
Appelant Advocate Anand Krishna Nagar & others
Respondant Advocate Vinit Mehata & other
Case Number: 681
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.