Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
Prajay Properties Pvt Ltd,Rep by its Director V/S V Rohitth
Court Name: Rangareddi
Appelant Advocate K Venkateshwarlu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 359
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2017
Prajay Properties Pvt Ltd,Rep by its Director V/S Santosh Kumar Kajjam
Court Name: Rangareddi
Appelant Advocate K Venkateshwarlu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 365
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2017
Prajay Properties Pvt Ltd,Rep by its Director V/S Yaswanth Chandolu
Court Name: Rangareddi
Appelant Advocate K Venkateshwarlu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 366
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2017
NITIN GUPTA & ANR. V/S M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. H.K.J. & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 446 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 08/04/2015 in Complaint No. 156/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD.201-212, SECOND FLOOR, PLOT NO. 3, SPLENDOUR FORUM, DIST...
Case Number: 446
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LIMITED V/S NITIN GUPTA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KAPIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 775 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 08/04/2015 in Complaint No. 156/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NITIN GUPTA & ANR.S/O. SHRI MADAN MOHAN GUPTA, PERMANNET RESIDENTS OF : CARE OF : RAMA AUTOMOBILES, ...
Case Number: 775
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Major Kamaljeet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rachit Kaushal Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:31 of 2017Date of Institution:11.01.2017Date of Decision:22.03.2017Major Kamaljeet Singh son of Makhan Singh.Mrs.Mandeep Kaur wife of Major Kamaljeet Singh.Both residents of House No.88, Sector-A, Cha...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2017
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Pritpal Kaur Bajwa
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harinder Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2017
M/S. Solid Properties V/S Pawan Bhargava & Ors.
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
NEW DELHI DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMM BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I P ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002Case No.CC/926/2009 Dated:IN THE MATTER OF:-Pawan BhargavaMrs. Vijay BhargavaMrs. Shashi BhargavaAll Residing atR/o 91, Medha ApartmentsMayur Vihar Phase 1Delhi-1100...
Case Number: 926
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2017
M/S. JVPD PROPERTIES LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S M/S. S & S VINIMAY PRIVATE LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MOHD. FUZAIL KHAN, MS. ZEEN PIRANI, MR. LATIF PIRANI & MR. PRAKASH KR. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2185 OF 20161. M/S. S & S VINIMAY PRIVATE LIMITED36/277, MOTILAL NAGAR NO: 03, M.G. RAOD, GOREGAON WEST, MUMBAI-400104...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. JVPD PROPERTIES LTD. & 2 ORS.PANCHRATNA, PANCHMA...
Case Number: 2185
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
M/S. JVPD PROPERTIES LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S M/S. ENEMBEE VINIMAY PRIVATE LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MOHD. FUZAIL KHAN, MS. ZEEN PIRANI, MR. LATIF PIRANI & MR. PRAKASH KR. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2185 OF 20161. M/S. S & S VINIMAY PRIVATE LIMITED36/277, MOTILAL NAGAR NO: 03, M.G. RAOD, GOREGAON WEST, MUMBAI-400104...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. JVPD PROPERTIES LTD. & 2 ORS.PANCHRATNA, PANCHMA...
Case Number: 2186
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.