Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAMAY MAHESHWARI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAMAY MAHESHWARI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 469
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INTELLECT LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 941
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INTELLECT LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 942
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INTELLECT LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 943
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INTELLECT LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 944
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INTELLECT LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate SHRI SANJAY JHANWAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 941 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 28/08/2015 in Complaint No. 29/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. V.C. DEWAN, HAVING ITS RE...
Case Number: 945
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Arvinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate Hitesh Gambhir
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1224 of 2012. Date of institution: 26.11.2012 Date of decision: 26.05.2017Smt. Madhu Bala aged about 60 years wife of Sh. Ravinder Garg, r/o H. No. C-2/2186, Indira Colony, Buria Gate, Jagadhri,...
Case Number: 1224
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANU PRABHAKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. JASPREET SINGH RAI, MR. ROHIT NAGPAL & MR. SACHIN SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1408 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/04/2016 in Complaint No. 153/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. INDERPAL SINGH SIDHUS/O. LATE JASPAL SINGH SIDHU, R/O. 114, NEW GURU TEG BAHADUR NAGAR, JALDHAR, P...
Case Number: 1408
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate G.D.Gupta
Respondant Advocate Y.P.Rajheri
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 149 of 2012 Date of institution: 13.02.2012 Date of decision: 24.05.2017Vivek Gupta son of Shri Hari Om Gupta resident of house No.C-4-1865, Civil Lines, Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. …...
Case Number: 149
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.