company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Chandigarh

Mrs. Rama Garg V/S M/s Sunihaar Properties

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arihant Goyal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.162 of 2017Date of Institution12.06.2017Date of Decision31.08.2017M/s Sunihaar Properties, through Sh. Gagandeep Rakhi, Resident of Flat No.11A, Aastha Homes, Opposite M.C. Park, Dhakoli (ECP of Sis...

Case Number: 162

|

Date of Filing: 12-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2017

Chandigarh

The Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Som Dutt Verma

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shubhashish Kukreti Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...

Case Number: 310

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2017

Telangana

1.M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hills Country (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S V. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Mr. Lakshmi Manohara Rao Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No.402, Vema Kamala Towers,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/60/2013In1. V. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Mr. Lakshmi Manohara Rao Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No.402, Vema Kamala Towers,Begumpet, Hyderabad-500 016............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.M/s. May...

Case Number: 60

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2018

Telangana

1.M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hills Country (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S V. Pavan Kumar S/o. Mr. Venkata Ranga Rao Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. V. Venkata Ranaga Rao, S/o. Chakradhara Rao, Aged about 60 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/61/2013In1. V. Pavan Kumar S/o. Mr. Venkata Ranga Rao Aged about 27 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. V. Venkata Ranaga Rao, S/o. Chakradhara Rao, Aged about 60 Years,R/o. Flat No.S4, Jana Apartments; shiva Aruna C...

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2018

Telangana

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hill County (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S B. Shailaja W/o. Ashok Aged about 40 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. B. Dayakara Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao M/s.M.R.Jayakar.

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/78/2013In1. B. Shailaja W/o. Ashok Aged about 40 Years, Rep. by GPA Mr. B. Dayakara Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,R/o. Plot No.123 Lotus Enclaive, Medchal, Ranga Reddy Dist. A.P............

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2018

Telangana

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hill County (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S B. Dayakara Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V.Appa Rao M/s.M.R.Jayakar

Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Visweswar Reddy

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/79/2013In1. B. Dayakara Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,R/o. Plot No.123 Lotus Enclave Medchal, Ranga Reddy Dist, A.P............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (forme...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2018

Telangana

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hill County (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Man V/S B. Venkata Papa Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Appa Rao ,Mr.M.R.Jayakar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/88/2013In1. B. Venkata Papa Rao, S/o. Mr. Krishna Rao, Aged about 58 Years,R/o. 123 Lotus Enclave, Medichal, Ranga Reddy Dist, A.P............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd., (formerl...

Case Number: 88

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2018

Gujarat

CHOTE LAL SING V/S M/S PRATHAM PROPERTIES

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V P NANANVATY

Respondant Advocate V.M.PANCHOLI

...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2017

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Mr. Hardeep Singh

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Inderpal Singh Bhinder, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER As on today, the total liability of the judgment debtors is Rs.61.20 Lacs. At the time of arguments, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over a demand draft bearing No.074623 dated 28.08.2017 in the sum of Rs.10 Lacs to the Counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant...

Case Number: 187

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2017

Karnataka

M/s. Orange Properties V/S Cyril Pereira,

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate Shashank N

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM , I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENTSRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBERComplaint...

Case Number: 1440

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.