Properties
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.
Ansal Properties & Inrastructure Ltd. V/S Som Dutt Verma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhashish Kukreti,Adv
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some-time, Counsel for the decree holders/complainant wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to approach the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties. If any, representation is made by the decree holders/complainants, the judgment debtors/Opp...
Case Number: 340
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2017
PINKI GOEL V/S ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AJAY GHANGAS
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1145 of 2016Date of Institution: 18.11.2016Date of Decision : 18.09.2017Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited, Sushant City, Panipat through its authorised representative Shri Chinmoy Bera. ...
Case Number: 1145
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2017
M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Sh. Gurpinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R C Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated by proxy Counsel for the decree holder that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. In view of above, proxy Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of this order be se...
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2017
M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Mandeep Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Balvinder Kaur Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 415
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2017
M/S. East - West Properties & Sri Avijit Sarkar V/S Sri Tapan Kr. Dutta
Court Name: Hooghly
Appelant Advocate Sri Shib Sankar Dhar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOOGHLYCC OF 2013PETITIONERVERSOPPOComplaint Case No. CC/60/20171. Sri Tapan Kr. DuttaHooghlyHooghlyWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. East - West Properties & Sri Avijit SarkarHooghlyHooghlyWest Bengal............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
M/s Ansal API Properties And Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Surinder Singh S/o Jagmal Singh
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Devender Kuamr
Respondant Advocate Hitesh Gambhir
Surinder Singla Vs. M/S Ansal APICC No.556 of 2013 Present: Mr. Devinder Kumar Advocate for the complainant. Mr. Hitesh Gambhir, Advocate for ops. Today the case was fixed for arguments. At this stage, Counsel for the complainant has made a separate statement in which he states t...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2017
1.Maytas Properties Limited, Now Known as Hill Country Properties Limited Regd. Office at Bachupally V/S Smt. Kalidindi Jhansi Lakshmi, Wife of K.K. Raju, Aged about 58 Years,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Prabhakar Sripada
Respondant Advocate M/s. K.Vishweswar Reddy
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/50/2014In1. Smt. Kalidindi Jhansi Lakshmi, Wife of K.K. Raju, Aged about 58 Years,R.o. Flat No.301, My Home Gardenia Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad 500016...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.Maytas Propert...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2018
M/s Phadnis Properties Limited V/S Mr. Joy K Jose
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J S Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2017
RAJAT SACHDEVA V/S ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AJAY GHANGHAS
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.89 of 2016 Date of Institution: 28.10.2016 Date of Decision: 07.09.2017M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd., 155 Ansal Bhawan, 16 KG Marg, New Delhi 110001 also at Ansal Sushant City, An...
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2018
M/s. Gold Fish Properties A Partnership Firm., & Others V/S Smt. Pushpavathi,& Others
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. Girisha V.S
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1736
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.