company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Rajasthan

ANSHAL PROPERTIES V/S KARAN SINGH JANGHU

Properties  

Court Name: Jaipur-I

Appelant Advocate JITENDRA MITRUKA

Respondant Advocate SANJAY MISHRA

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-11-2017

Telangana

1. R.S. Subramanian, Country Manager, DHL Express Indian P Ltd., V/S Ms. Fairy Rose Enterprises Rep. by its Properties KBR Prasad

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms.K.B.R. Prasad P I P

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. FA/337/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/04/2014 in Case No. CC/648/2012 of District Hyderabad-II)1. Ms. Fairy Rose Enterprises Rep. by its Properties KBR Prasad12.13.437 by 1, Street No.1, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 17.......

Case Number: 337

|

Date of Filing: 20-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-12-2017

Punjab

Sky Blue Properties Pvt. Ltd. V/S Jagwinder Kaur

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 14-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2017

Haryana

Ansal Properties V/S Gulab Singh

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: Kurukshetra

Appelant Advocate P.C.Tayal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 248

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 10-11-2017

Rajasthan

ANSHAL PROPERTIES V/S SMT. INDRAKALA SHARMA

Properties  

Court Name: Jaipur-I

Appelant Advocate R.S. DAGAYACH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1070

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Ltd V/S S.K. Rathaur

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Nitish Kumar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/44/20161. S.K. RathaurLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal Properties And Infrastructure LtdLucknow............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Ltd V/S Laikha Pandey

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Nitish Kumar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/45/20161. Laikha PandeyLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal Properties And Infrastructure LtdLucknow............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:H...

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2017

Haryana

Ansal Properties & Infrastructgure V/S Sunil Kumar S/o Shree Ram

Ansal Properties   Properties   Shree Ram  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Yashpal Rajheri

Respondant Advocate Hitesh Gambhir

C.C.No.152 of 2016.Sunil Kumar Versus M/s. Ansal Properties etc.Present: Sh. Yash Pal Rajheri, Adv. for the complainant. Sh. Hitesh Gambhir Adv. for the Ops. Today this case was fixed for placing official record regarding EDC by the Ops. However, t...

Case Number: 152

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2017

Haryana

Ansal Properties & Infrastructgure V/S Kewal Krishan S/o Sh.Harbans Lal

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Yash Pal Rajheri

Respondant Advocate Hitesh Gambhir

C.C.No.153 of 2016.Kewal Krishan Versus M/s. Ansal Properties etc.Present: Sh. Yash Pal Rajheri, Adv. for the complainant. Sh. Hitesh Gambhir Adv. for the Ops. Today this case was fixed for placing official record ...

Case Number: 153

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2017

Haryana

M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited V/S Shonak Bansal son of Shri Ashok Kumar,

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Karanjeet Singh

Respondant Advocate Hitesh Gambhir OP No.1, P.K.Garg OP No.3

C.C.No.601 of 2012/RBR No.7 of 2015.Shonak Bansal Versus M/s. Ansal Properties & others.Present: Sh. Karanjeet Singh, Adv. for the complainant. Sh. Hitesh Gambhir Adv. for Op No.1. Op No.2 already given-up. Sh. P.K.Garg...

Case Number: 601

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.