company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Maharashtra

RIVERVIEW PROPERTIES PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR MR INDERMAL S GANDHI V/S MUKESH GOVIND SAVANT

Properties  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune

Appelant Advocate SHINDE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 15-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2017

Delhi

M/S MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. V/S LALLU RAM SAINI

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SINGH RATHORE

Respondant Advocate

N THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :22.11.2017Date of Decision :23.11.2017 FIRST APPEAL NO.562/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Shri Lallu Ram Saini,S/o. Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sai...

Case Number: 562

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2017

Punjab

M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure V/S Dr. Dinesh Kumar Chauhan

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Chanan Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 390

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2017

Uttar Pradesh

M/S Granite Gate Properties Pvt Ltd V/S Dr. Anamika Basu An Oth.

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra

Respondant Advocate k.s. bisen

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/298/20161. Dr. Anamika Basu An Oth.Faridabad Haryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Granite Gate Properties Pvt LtdMumbai............Opp....

Case Number: 298

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-01-2018

NCDRC

KAJARIA INVESTMENT & PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & 11 ORS. V/S SUJIT BOSE & 11 ORS.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AMAN VACHHER & MR. ASHUTOSH DUBEY

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJOY KUMAR GHOSH (For 1to11 R)

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 710 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/09/2012 in Complaint No. 22/2011 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. SUJIT BOSE & 11 ORS.R/O. FLAT NO. 12, 288, ROWLAND ROAD,KOLKATA-7000202. C.P. SHAHR/O. FLAT NO....

Case Number: 710

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 28-11-2017

Delhi

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S MR. RAJEEV RANJAN & ANR.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SUMAN TRIPATHY

Respondant Advocate

IN THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 20.11.17Date of Decision : 27.11.17Complaint No.1703/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Mr. Rajeev RanjanMrs. Ruby RanjanBoth resident of :D-347...

Case Number: 1703

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2017

Haryana

Sai Parsad Properties V/S Mukhtyar Sg.

Properties  

Court Name: Hisar

Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar Panwar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 291

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2018

Karnataka

KRK Properties Pvt. Ltd., V/S Smt. Uma Suresh,

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate ABM

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 410

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2017

Karnataka

KRK Properties Pvt. Ltd., V/S Smt. Uma Suresh,

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate ABM

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 411

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2017

Karnataka

KRK Properties Pvt. Ltd., V/S Smt. Uma Suresh,

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate ABM

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 412

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.