company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3635 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Properties V/S Manoj Kumar Srivastava

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate C L Verma

Respondant Advocate Anurag Singh

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/136( Date of Filing : 12 Sep 2013 )1. Manoj Kumar Srivastavaa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal Propertiesa............Opp.Party(s) BE...

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2018

West Bengal

Havelock Properties Ltd. V/S Usha Agarwal

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. R.S. Tiwari Mr. Ayusman Dey

Respondant Advocate Mr. P. R. Baksi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Complaint Case No. CC/304/2013( Date of Filing : 09 Dec 2013 )1. Usha AgarwalC/o Shankar Synthetics, 9/1, Ramkumar Rakshit Lane, Chinipalli, P.S. Posta, Kolkata - 700 007............C...

Case Number: 304

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2018

NCDRC

M/S. GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. & ANR. V/S JAGDISH CHAND RANA & ANR.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. CSG LAW ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 437 OF 20171. JAGDISH CHAND RANA & ANR.A-316, Tarang Apartments 19, IndraPrastha ExtensionDehli - 1100922. Mrs Anita Rana A-316, Tarang Apartments 19, IndraPrastha ExtensionDelhi-110092...........Complaina...

Case Number: 437

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-05-2018

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Pritpal Kaur Bajwa

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Harinder Kumar Adv.

Respondant Advocate

A Settlement Deed dated 13.04.2018, which was signed by both the parties, has been placed on record. In view of above, this execution application has become infructuous having been fully satisfied. If Counsel for the decree holder contends that there is violation of terms and con...

Case Number: 322

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-05-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Properties and Infracture Ltd V/S Banarasi Singh

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/853/2018( Date of Filing : 10 May 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/04/2018 in Case No. C/173/2015 of District Lucknow-I)1. Banarasi SinghS/O La...

Case Number: 853

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Properties V/S M/S N.V Associates

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: Meerut

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 103

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-06-2018

Maharashtra

1. M/S Phadnis Properties Ltd V/S Mr. Balkrishna Dattatraya Godse

Properties  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2018

Uttar Pradesh

M/s Granite Gate Properties Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sanjeev Srivastava

Properties  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate None

Respondant Advocate None

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/195/2015( Date of Filing : 30 Mar 2015 )1. Sanjeev Srivastava42B,United India Apartments,Mayur Vihar,Phase-1New DelhiNew Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Gra...

Case Number: 195

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2018

Chhattisgarh

M/s Sai Prasad Properties Ltd. V/S Shri Sarvagya Pansari

Properties  

Court Name: Raipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Sanjeev Banjare

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2018

Chhattisgarh

M/s Sai Prasad Properties Ltd. V/S Shri Ravi Kumar

Properties  

Court Name: Raipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Sanjeev Banjare

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.