Prestige Estates
Latest Judgments
Total 48 Consumer Court Cases Against Prestige Estates.
PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD. & ANR. V/S VIVEK SHANDALIYA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. NEW DELHI LAW OFFICES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3455 OF 20171. VIVEK SHANDALIYA & ANR.R/O 12071, PRESTIGE SHANTINIKETAN WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD,BANGALORE-560048KARNATAKA2. MR. SUSHEEL KUMARR/O 21115, PRESTIGE SHANTINIKETAN WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD,BANGALORE-56...
Case Number: 3455
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2024
Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. V/S Ashish Kansal
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate M.V. Devaraju Associates
Respondant Advocate Mohumed Sadiqh
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/20/185( Date of Filing : 20 Feb 2020 )1. Ashish KansalS/o Mr.Bhagawan Dass Kansal, aged About 41 Years, R/at No.7093, Prestige Ferns Residency,Haralur Road,B...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2024
M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD. V/S DEEPAK DEWAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S DUA ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2136 OF 20171. DEEPAK DEWANS/O HANSRAJ DEWAN, E-218, GREATER KAILASH - II, NEW DELHI - 110 048...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS AND MANAGING DIRECTO...
Case Number: 2136
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2024
Prestige estates projects ltd., V/S Salone Gupta,
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1687
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2023
M/s Prestige Estates Projects Limited, V/S B.M. Mahanthesha Patil,
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/727/2018( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 2018 )1. B.M. Mahanthesha Patil,s/o Patil Mahanth Goud, aged about 58 years, Residing at No.06, Block No.26, SBM Colony, VivekanandaNagar Mysore 560023 2. M.Ashwini D/o B.Mahanthesha Patil, Aged about 28 year...
Case Number: 727
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2023
Prestige estates projects ltd., V/S Salone Gupta,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate TC Gupta
Respondant Advocate 1. Md. Sadiq & 2-Svd
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/966/2021( Date of Filing : 01 Dec 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/10/2021 in Case No. CC/1687/2019 of District Bangalore 2nd Additional)1. Salone Gupta,S/o Shri TC Gupta R/o S77...
Case Number: 966
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2022
M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD. V/S OMAR BALSARA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SURI & MS. GEETIKA KAPUR
Respondant Advocate M/S DUA ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3760 OF 20171. OMAR BALSARA & ANR.R/O. NO. 802, GLEN HEIGHTS, HIRANANDANI GARDENS,MUMBAI-400076MAHARAHSTRA2. ZOHRA PATEL BALSARAR/O. NO. 802, GLEN HEIGHTS, HIRANANDANI GARDENS,MUMBAI-400076MAHARAHSTRA........
Case Number: 3760
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2022
Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. V/S Salone Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate I.P.(Salone Gupta)
Respondant Advocate M.S
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.Complaint Case No. CC/550/2019( Date of Filing : 21 Nov 2019 )1. Salone GuptaAged about 33 years, S/o T.C.Gupta, R/a S-77, Golden Enclave, Old Airport road, Bangalore-560017 Rep. by his Authority hold...
Case Number: 550
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2023
M/s. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd., V/S Sri. Avinash Murthy,
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Sachidananda.K
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1580
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2022
Prestige estates projects ltd., V/S Salone Gupta,
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1687
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Prestige Estates in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Prestige Estates ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Prestige Estates under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.