company-name-logo

Poddar

Latest Judgments

Total 481 Consumer Court Cases Against Poddar.

West Bengal

Mr. Ram Kanchan Hazra. V/S Dheeraj Promoters (An Associate of poddar Project Ltd)

Poddar   Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Md. Farhaduddin.

Respondant Advocate Mr. Debdas Rudra.

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2022

Jharkhand

V.S. Kumar (CEO) , S.M.V. Beverages V/S S.N. Poddar

Poddar  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 109

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2019

West Bengal

Club 7 Holidays Ltd. V/S Ramesh Poddar

Club   Holidays   Poddar  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/901. Ramesh Poddar5A, Block-B, VIP Towers, 80, Golaghata Road, Kolkata-700048.KolkataWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Club 7 Holidays Ltd.10, Lowdowne Terrace, Kol-26.KolkataWest Bengal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath D...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CHUNNI LAL PODDAR V/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD

United India Insurance   Poddar   Insurance  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. A. K. DE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/05/2007 in Appeal No. 2858/SC/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD THROUGH ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE - 1, KANCH...

Case Number: 2875

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2007

|

Date of Upload: 08-11-2011

Orissa

Tarini Motors V/S Sri Jaleswar Poddar

Poddar  

Court Name: Kendujhar

Appelant Advocate Sri D.K Jena

Respondant Advocate C.Hota

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-05-2018

NCDRC

ICICI BANK LTD. V/S YOGESH KUMAR PODDAR

ICICI Bank   Poddar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANURAG TOMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1941 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/03/2011 in Appeal No. 514/2009 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. YOGESH KUMAR PODDARR/O RANI ROAD , NR CHITRA TALKIES, KORBA THE.&KORBACG...........Petitio...

Case Number: 1941

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2011

NCDRC

GHANSHYAM PODDAR AND ORS V/S NAGPUR GOLDEN TRANSPORT CO.

Transport   Poddar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate ASHUTOSH SHARMA

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 450 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/11/2006 in Appeal No. 3/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. NAGPUR GOLDEN TRANSPORT CO.S/O. VIJAY PODDR PODDAR SUITPIECERAND SAREE CENTRE STATION ROAD MANE...

Case Number: 450

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2011

Karnataka

Poddar Diamond Ltd. Co. V/S Neeha Nagaraj Naik

Poddar  

Court Name: Uttara Kannda

Appelant Advocate R.S Prabhu

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 21-05-2020

West Bengal

M/S TATA Motors Finance V/S Subrata Poddar

Tata Motors   Finance   Tata Motors Finance   Tata   Poddar  

Court Name: Cooch Behar

Appelant Advocate Ananda Joyti Majumber and Sougata Chakraborty

Respondant Advocate Sri. Bibek Kr. Dutta

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2018

West Bengal

Poddar Seva Sadan Pvt. Ltd V/S Smt. Krishna Datta Biswas

Poddar  

Court Name: Cooch Behar

Appelant Advocate Sri. Santosh Kumar Sah

Respondant Advocate Anandajoti Majumdar

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Poddar in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Poddar ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Poddar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.