Poddar
Latest Judgments
Total 481 Consumer Court Cases Against Poddar.
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 317 OF 2013 WITH IA/7180/20131. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office: 6, Community Ce...
Case Number: 317
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2014
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 317 OF 2013 WITH IA/7180/20131. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office: 6, Community Ce...
Case Number: 318
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2014
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 317 OF 2013 WITH IA/7180/20131. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,Park Center, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office: 6, Community Ce...
Case Number: 319
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2014
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 320 OF 20131. Shri MAYANK PODDAR & ANR.,Park Street, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office: 6, Community Centre, Saket,NEW DEL...
Case Number: 320
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2014
KHOSLA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS V/S SUDIPTA PODDAR
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.EA No 23 Of 2014 1. SUDIPTA PODDAR12A, Banamali Chatterjee Street, P.S-Tala, Kolkata-700002. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. KHOSLA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & OTHERSSharadhanjali Apartment 33/1B, B.T Road, Kolkata-700002.2...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ORIENTED INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V/S RAVI KUMAR PODDAR
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2022
Sri Aniruddha Poddar V/S Santosh Kr. Gorai
Court Name: Purulia
Appelant Advocate Rajib Dutta
Respondant Advocate A.B.Ghosh
...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S Smt. KALPANA PODDAR & ANR.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 296 OF 20131. Smt. KALPANA PODDAR & ANR.,W/o Mr. Mayank Poddar, Park Centre, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office: 6, Communi...
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2014
KHOSLA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS V/S SUDIPTA PODDAR
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate PANKAJ DEY
Respondant Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/79/2013 1. SUDIPTA PODDAR12A,BANAMALI CHATTERJEE STREET,P.S-TALA,KOLKATA-700002. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. KHOSLA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS33/1B,B.T ROAD,KOLKATA-700002. ...........Respo...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS., V/S M/s MAYANK PODDAR HUF,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 351 OF 20131. M/s MAYANK PODDAR HUF,Through its Karta, SHri Mayank Poddar, Park Centre, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office:...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Poddar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Poddar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Poddar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.