Poddar
Latest Judgments
Total 481 Consumer Court Cases Against Poddar.
Belgharia Indane (Distributor for Indane) and ors. V/S Sanjoy Poddar S/O Lt Himansu Poddar
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 527
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2016
I.C.I.C.I.Bank Limited through Branch Manager V/S Shiv Kumar Poddar s/o Narsingh Lal Poddar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Bhatia
Respondant Advocate Abhisek Bharndri
Case Number: 535
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2016
Sri Khokan Poddar V/S Sri Biswajit Biswas
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Debasish Biswas, Mr. Somip Roy
Respondant Advocate Ms. Mousumi Chakraborty
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/1139/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/02/2013 in Case No. cc/272/2012 of District South 24 Parganas DF, Alipore)1. Sri Biswajit BiswasS/o, Lt. Ajit Kanti Biswas, G...
Case Number: 1139
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2015
Ashok Kumar Dutta V/S Santosh Kumar Poddar
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Ujjal Trivedi
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/187/20151. Santosh Kumar PoddarFlat No. 3-F, 3rd Floor, Vaishali Gharh, 23-A, Shyama Charan Moitra Lane, P.S. Cossipore, Kolkata-700036...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2016
M.V.D.A V/S RADHY SHAYAM PODDAR
Court Name: Mathura
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer ForumMathuraUttar PradeshMiscellaneous Application No. MA/82/2012InMA/26/20081. RADHY SHAYAM PODDARMATHURA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M.V.D.AMATHURA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RADHY SHYAM SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAMBABU KEWAT MEMBER For th...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2015
M.V.D.A V/S MADAN MOHAN PODDAR
Court Name: Mathura
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer ForumMathuraUttar PradeshMiscellaneous Application No. MA/83/2012InMA/25/20081. MADAN MOHAN PODDARMATHURA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M.V.D.AMATHURA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RADHY SHYAM SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAMBABU KEWAT MEMBER For the...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2015
Sri Ganesh Lal Poddar V/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Poddar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s Sushil Prasad & Sanjay Prasad
Respondant Advocate M/s R. Singh, A.K. Tiwari, A. Pradhan & P. Purnay
JHARKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RANCHIFINAL ORDERFirst Appeal No. FA/152/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/07/2009 in Case No. CC/31/2008 of District Deoghar)1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam LimitedO/o- the Telecom District Manager, Dudhni Chowk, Dumka, P.S. & Distr...
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2016
M/S PODDAR DEVELOPERS V/S M/S SAMRUDDHI COMPLEX HOUSING CO-OPRATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
Court Name: Raigad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2015
M/S PODDAR DEVELOPERS V/S M/S SAMRUDDHI COMPLEX HOUSING CO-OPRATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
Court Name: Raigad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2015
M/s. Poddar Developers Ltd. and Others V/S Samrudhi Complex Housing Co-Operative Society Ltd. Though its Chairman Mrs. Swarada Swanand Nargolkar
Co-operative Society Society Poddar
Court Name: Raigad
Appelant Advocate k. S. Virk
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Poddar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Poddar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Poddar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.