company-name-logo

Poddar

Latest Judgments

Total 481 Consumer Court Cases Against Poddar.

Maharashtra

Phoneix Realty and infra Through its Partners 1. Mr Rahul Narayan Poddar V/S Mrs Malti Moreswer Patil

Poddar  

Court Name: Thane

Appelant Advocate Adv K P Boda

Respondant Advocate

जिल्हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, ठाणे .Complaint Case No. CC/736/20161. Mrs Malti Moreswer PatilAt Gopal Nivas, goddev village, Bhayandar east, Dist Thane 401105ThaneMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Phoneix...

Case Number: 736

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

West Bengal

Country Vacations and another V/S Swapan Poddar and another

Country Vacations   Country Vacations   Poddar  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/4011. Swapan Poddar and anotherC-57, Amarabati, Sodepur, Kolkata-700110.KolkataWB2. Sangita PoddarC-57, Amarabati, Sodepur...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 27-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-12-2016

NCDRC

MOYANK PODDAR & ORS. V/S SATYA NARAYAN ADHIKARI

Poddar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KALICHARAN DAS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1936 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/04/2011 in Appeal No. 322/2009 of the State Commission Orissa)1. SATYA NARAYAN ADHIKARI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MOYANK PODDAR & ORS.2. SHRI G.B PATNAIKBU...

Case Number: 1936

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2018

Rajasthan

AVIVA LIFE INSU.LTD. V/S PAWAN PODDAR

Poddar  

Court Name: Jaipur-III

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 1823

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Rajasthan

AVIVA LIFE INSU. LTD. V/S VIMLA PODDAR

Poddar  

Court Name: Jaipur-III

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 1825

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Rajasthan

Pardeep Poddar s/o Jagdish Poddar V/S K.S.Cars Pvt. Ltd.through Director Arun Singh

Poddar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Pursotam Vays

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 463

|

Date of Filing: 22-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2016

Rajasthan

K.S.Ford K.S.Cars Pvt.Ltd . through Manager V/S Pardeep Poddar s/o Jagdish Poddar

Poddar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Hement Singhal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 499

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2016

Rajasthan

Pradeep Poddar s/o Jagdish Poddar V/S Ford India Pvt. Ltd. through its Manager S P Koli

Ford India   Ford   Poddar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Saneep Phatak

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 593

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2016

Assam

Sri Joydev Poddar V/S The Branch Manager, State Bank of India

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Poddar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. V. K. Barooah

Respondant Advocate Mrs. S. K. Nargis

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONGUWAHATIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/2016InFirst Appeal No. A/17/20161. The Branch Manager, State Bank of IndiaRegistered office at Madam Cama Road, Mumbai and local head office at G. S. Road, Dispur and various ...

Case Number: 23

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2017

NCDRC

DR. RANJANA V. DHANU & ANR. V/S MADHUMITA PODDAR & ANR.

Poddar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. AGM PARTNERS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 800 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 07/08/2015 in Complaint No. 138/2009 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MADHUMITA PODDAR & ANR.W/O. MR. SUDEP KUMAR SAHA, A-206, MOUNT EVEREST, BHAKTI PARK, WADALA EAS...

Case Number: 800

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Poddar in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Poddar ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Poddar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.