company-name-logo

Photography

Latest Judgments

Total 30 Consumer Court Cases Against Photography.

Maharashtra

SHUBH PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHUBH SURUSE V/S SHILPA KAMBLE W/O SIMADRY SRIMANY

Photography  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. A.S. SIDDIQUI

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/565/2020( Date of Filing : 22 Dec 2020 )1. SHILPA KAMBLE W/O SIMADRY SRIMANYR/O. K. NARAYNAPURA, BANGALORE-560077BangaloreKARNA...

Case Number: 565

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 12-04-2022

Kerala

WEVA PHOTOGRAPHY V/S JATHIN SASI

Photography  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate AGINOV MATHAPPAN

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/18/375( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2018 )1. JATHIN SASIFLAT NO 103 3RD CROSS VENKATESWARA LAYOUT BANGALORE...........Complainant(s)Versus1. WEVA PHOTOGRAPHY1ST FLR KC TOWER NR OBERON MALL PADIVATTOM EDAPALLY ...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2022

Haryana

Singh Lab Photography V/S Devinder Singh S/o Major Suchha Singh

Photography  

Court Name: Kurukshetra

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KURUKSHETRA.Consumer Complaint No.263 of 2021Date of Instt.:8.09.2021Date of Decision:24.11.2021Devinder Singh son of Major Sucha Singh resident of village Julmat, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. …….Com...

Case Number: 263

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2021

Gujarat

EDYOANKS PHOTOGRAPHY NA PROPRIETOR ANKITSINH PRADIPSINH RAJPUT V/S HARKISHAN BHIKHABHAI MISTRY

Photography  

Court Name: Navsari

Appelant Advocate A.A.USMANI

Respondant Advocate M.V.KOTWANI

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2021

Kerala

FAIZAL PHOTOGRAPHY V/S PIYUSH CHANDAK

Photography  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/18/296( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 2018 )1. PIYUSH CHANDAKD D PLATINUM PLANET TOWER 1THAMANAM KATHRIKKADADU RD KALOOR KOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. FAIZAL PHOTOGRAPHYNR ALUVA RAILWAY STATION ALUVA RE...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2022

Madhya Pradesh

R.A.S. Photography V/S Ashish Basantlal Mishra

Photography  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2019

Tamil Nadu

Matrimony Photography V/S Peter Frank

Photography  

Court Name: South Chennai

Appelant Advocate M/s M Selvam

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing : 08.06.2018 Date of Order : 24.01.2019 DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L....

Case Number: 295

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-04-2019

Uttar Pradesh

ATUL VEDIOGRAPHY AND PHOTOGRAPHY LTD. V/S CHANDRAKALA SINGH

Photography  

Court Name: Jaunpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 236

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-11-2017

Maharashtra

Shri Movies Photography and Video Graphy Designer V/S Laxman Kanhobarao Molake

Photography  

Court Name: Nanded

Appelant Advocate Adv. V. B. Kendre

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2017

NCDRC

SHAHBAAZ PHOTOGRAPHY COMPANY V/S VENGARD COLORLAB & STUDIO

Photography  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRIANK ADHYARU

Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT R. PANDYA & MR. DEEPAK GOEL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2332 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/02/2013 in Appeal No. 1121/2009 of the State Commission Gujarat) WITH IA/7674/20131. VENGARD COLORLAB & STUDIOTHROUGH ITS OWNER NAMELY, RAMESHCHANDRA ISHWARLAL ...

Case Number: 2332

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Photography in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Photography ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Photography under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.