Pepsico
Latest Judgments
Total 179 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.
Pepsico holdings India Pvt Ltd & others V/S P.Sakthivel
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate P.Chandrasekaran & others
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing : 25.08.2011 Date of Order : 11.04.2019DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M...
Case Number: 248
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2019
PEPSICO INDIA PVT LTD V/S SMT REETA RAWAT
Court Name: Lucknow-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2020
SHYAM SHARAD GUMTE V/S CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. SION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G. A. KULKARNI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2019
Chetan Sharma V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Anshul Goel V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
1.THE MANAGER, PEPSICO INDIA & 3 OTHERS. V/S N.MANIKANDAN.S/O.B.NARANAN.
Court Name: Salem
Appelant Advocate 1.MR.C.SRIDHARAN, & MR.K.S.RAJESH KUMAR.
Respondant Advocate A.S.Madheswaran
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2019
Pepsico India Holdings V/S Shantanu Saini
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Complainant in person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Deepak Jain
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 616/2017( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2017 )1. Shantanu Saini S/o Sh. Rajesh Saini R/o H.No. 777/19 Aimirash Factory Saini Gali Arya Nagar, Green Road, Gali No.9 Rohtak............Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 616
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2019
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. V/S Deepak Nagar
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/338/2017Date of Institution:20/04/2017Date of Decision:21/12/2018Deepak Nagar son of Sh. Mahipal Singh Nagar, Resident of Village Sarangpur, U.T. Chandigarh.……… ...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2018
Pepsico India V/S Akhilesh Tiwari
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Verma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/538( Date of Filing : 14 Mar 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Akhilesh Tiwari a...........Appella...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2018
Anil Singh V/S Pepsico India Holdings Ltd
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1935/2014( Date of Filing : 26 Sep 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/09/2014 in Case No. C/243/2008 of District Varanasi)1. Pepsico India Holdin...
Case Number: 1935
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.