company-name-logo

Pepsico

Latest Judgments

Total 181 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.

Uttar Pradesh

Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. V/S Virendra Kumar Gupta

Pepsico  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate A. Wahi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 111

|

Date of Filing: 14-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-05-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Pepsico India holding Ltd. V/S Baijnath

Pepsico  

Court Name: Kanpur Nagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 05-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2019

Tamil Nadu

Pepsico holdings India Pvt Ltd & others V/S P.Sakthivel

Pepsico  

Court Name: South Chennai

Appelant Advocate P.Chandrasekaran & others

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing : 25.08.2011 Date of Order : 11.04.2019DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M...

Case Number: 248

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 17-06-2019

Uttar Pradesh

PEPSICO INDIA PVT LTD V/S SMT REETA RAWAT

Pepsico  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 191

|

Date of Filing: 21-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2020

Maharashtra

SHYAM SHARAD GUMTE V/S CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. SION

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate G. A. KULKARNI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-03-2019

Chandigarh

Chetan Sharma V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2019

Chandigarh

Anshul Goel V/S M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathi, Raj Kumar, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

It is stated at bar by the Counsel for the appellant that in terms of order passed by this Commission, the entire decreetal amount i.e. Rs.2,15,000/- stood deposited with the registry of this Commission. At the time of arguments, both the parties have shown utmost grace and the m...

Case Number: 190

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2019

Tamil Nadu

1.THE MANAGER, PEPSICO INDIA & 3 OTHERS. V/S N.MANIKANDAN.S/O.B.NARANAN.

Pepsico  

Court Name: Salem

Appelant Advocate 1.MR.C.SRIDHARAN, & MR.K.S.RAJESH KUMAR.

Respondant Advocate A.S.Madheswaran

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 18-03-2019

Haryana

Pepsico India Holdings V/S Shantanu Saini

Pepsico  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Complainant in person

Respondant Advocate Sh. Deepak Jain

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 616/2017( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2017 )1. Shantanu Saini S/o Sh. Rajesh Saini R/o H.No. 777/19 Aimirash Factory Saini Gali Arya Nagar, Green Road, Gali No.9 Rohtak............Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 616

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2019

Chandigarh

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. V/S Deepak Nagar

Pepsico  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/338/2017Date of Institution:20/04/2017Date of Decision:21/12/2018Deepak Nagar son of Sh. Mahipal Singh Nagar, Resident of Village Sarangpur, U.T. Chandigarh.……… ...

Case Number: 338

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-12-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.