company-name-logo

Pepsico

Latest Judgments

Total 181 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.

Uttar Pradesh

Vinay Shankar Shukla V/S M/s Pepsico

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh

Respondant Advocate A.K. Pandey

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/200( Date of Filing : 30 Jan 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/s Pepsicoa...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 2012

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

Gujarat

PEPSICO INDIA HOLIDING PVT LTD V/S JAYSUKHBHAI JERAMBHAI DEVANI

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJIV N MEHTA

Respondant Advocate A A Parikh

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2021

Gujarat

PEPSICO INDIA HOLIDING PVT LTD V/S KRUPABEN R SAMPAT

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJIV N MEHTA

Respondant Advocate A A Parikh

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2021

Tamil Nadu

V. SUDHAKAR V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., THE PROPRIETOR

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M. KANDASAMY

Respondant Advocate K. MANIMUTHU KUMARASAMY MANNAN

Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. FA/233/2014( Date of Filing : 05 Apr 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., THE PROPRIETORNO. 6, GST ROAD, MAMUNDUR VILLAGE, MATHURANTHAGAM TALUK-603 111...........Appellant(s)Versus1. V. SUD...

Case Number: 233

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2021

Tamil Nadu

ARUN KUMAR V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., CONSENT OFFICER

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M. KANDASAMY

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. FA/337/2014( Date of Filing : 23 Sep 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., CONSENT OFFICERNO. 6, G.S.T. ROAD, MAMANDUR, MADURANTAGAM TALUK, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 337

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2021

Maharashtra

Pepsico India Holidings Pvt.Ltd.( Frito- Lay Division) Through Production Manager V/S Ranjit Marutirao Deshmukh

Pepsico  

Court Name: Kolhapur

Appelant Advocate A.A.Bhumkar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,KOLHAPURCentral Administrative Building, Second Floor, South Side, Kasaba Bawada Road, Kolhapur.Phone No. (0231) 2651327, Fax No. (0231) 2651327.Complaint Case No. CC/16/38( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2016 )1. Ranjit Marutirao Deshmukh...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2021

Haryana

Pepsico (Pepsico India Holdings Pvt Ltd) and Others V/S Prakash Singh

Pepsico  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh Santokh Singh

Respondant Advocate Sh Rajneesh Kumar

Case Number: 63

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-09-2021

Gujarat

PEPSICO INDIA HOLIDING PVT LTD V/S JAYSUKHBHAI J DEVANI

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJIV MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 27-05-2021

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2021

Gujarat

PEPSICO INDIA HOLIDING PVT LTD V/S KRUPABEN R SAMPAT

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJIV N MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 27-05-2021

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Pepsico India PVT. LTD. V/S Shri Vijay Kumar

Pepsico  

Court Name: Muradabad-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 77

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.