Pepsico
Latest Judgments
Total 181 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.
PEPSICO INDIA LTD V/S RAGIN JAIN
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate ARPIT BHOOT
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/613/20141. RAGIN JAIN JODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PEPSICO INDIA LTDJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For the Complainan...
Case Number: 613
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2015
SAURABH LATHAR & 2 ORS. V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS ARADHANA SOFT DRINKS CO.)
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. J. SAGAR ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3942 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/07/2012 in Appeal No. 809/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1305/2013,IA/1742/20131. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS ARADHANA SOF...
Case Number: 3942
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
PUNIT SHARMA & 2 ORS. V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS ARADHANA SOFT DRINKS CO.)
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. J. SAGAR ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3942 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/07/2012 in Appeal No. 809/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1305/2013,IA/1742/20131. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS ARADHANA SOF...
Case Number: 3943
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD V/S KAILASHBEN K. MODI
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate P K SAGAR
Respondant Advocate S M SHAH
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2019
PEPSICO INDAI HOLDINGS PVT.LTD. V/S MANOJ MAJI
Court Name: Katni
Appelant Advocate ..
Respondant Advocate ..
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2016
M/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD V/S SHRI BALARAM S DUTTA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/1179(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/09/2010 in Case No. 129/2003 of District Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban))1. SHRI BALARAM S DUTTA FATIMABAI CHAWL 1 ST FLOOR ROOM NO 6 SARVO...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. JAY BAJRANAG KIRANA 2. VISHESH DIST PVT LTD . 3. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT LTD V/S MAULIK B SONI
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2021
Himanshu Sharma V/S Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harmanjit Singh, Adv. for resp. no. 1, Resp. no. 2 & 3 already exparte.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 223 of 2012 1. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.Earlier Known as Aradhana Soft Drinks company Village Ali Asgarpur, P.O. Ganjbar P...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SANJAY PRASAD KUSHWAHA V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. VIRMANI AND VIRMANI
Respondant Advocate DR. S.K. SHRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 674 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 28/09/2006 in Appeal No. 732/2006 of the State Commission Bihar)1. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.3B , DLF , CPROPRATE PARK S BOLCK QUTAB ENCLAVE PHASE ,I...
Case Number: 674
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2012
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT LTD V/S MR TEJPRATAP SINGH
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SURAJ IYER
Respondant Advocate
ADDITIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMIN BLDG, THIRD FLOOR, NR CHETANA COLLAGE, BANDRA (E), MUMBAI 400051Complaint Case No. CC/12/681. MR TEJPRATAP SINGHNAV NIDIAN BLDG, ROAD NO.9, DAULAT NAGR, BORIVALI(EAST), MUMBAI 4000662. MR AKSHAY SAWANTFLA...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.