company-name-logo

Pepsico

Latest Judgments

Total 179 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.

Tamil Nadu

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2018

Pondicherry

R.Jayakumar S/o P.S.Rajagopal and two other V/S The Manager, Pepsico India Holdings Pvt Ltd

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/22/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. First Appeal No. A/22/2015 of District Pondicherry)1. The Manager, Pepsico India Holdings Pvt LtdNo.6,GST, Mamandur, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District Tamilnadu-603501 ...........Appellant(s...

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2016

Punjab

Pepsico India Hlding Pvt V/S Snder Paul Goyal

Pepsico  

Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib

Appelant Advocate in person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FATEHGARH SAHIB. Consumer Complaint No.05 of 2015 Date of institution: 21.01.2015 Date of decision : 23.09.2016Sunder Paul Goyal son of Durga Charan Goyal, resident of House No.201, Sector 4-D Shastri Nagar...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2016

Uttarakhand

Sh. Satendra Kumar V/S Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2016

Haryana

M/s Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashish Garg S/o Ghanshyam Dass

Pepsico  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Ravi Shanker Garg

Respondant Advocate paveen Kaushik

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.31 of 2016 Instituted on:25.01.2016 Date of order:22.07.2016Ashish Garg son of Ghanshyam Dass Garg, resident of H.No.654/23, Aggarsain Nagar, Rohtak road, Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.M/s Pepsico I...

Case Number: 31

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2016

Punjab

Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. & others V/S Gaurav Batta

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ferry Sofat & Amrita Singh

Respondant Advocate

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.380 of 2014 Date of Institution: 04.04.2014 Date of Decision: 17.06.2016Gaurav Batta s/o Late V...

Case Number: 380

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 23-06-2016

Haryana

Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd V/S Shiv Yadav

Pepsico  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Pardeep Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. Vikas Jain

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Conssummer Savrises Pepsico Ind.Pvt.Ltd. etc. V/S Aashish Gupta

Pepsico  

Court Name: Firozabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2016

Chandigarh

Bansun V/S Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Pepsico  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:152 of 2016Date of Institution:17.05.2016Date of Decision19.05.2016Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Limited, having its Registered Office at 3-B, DLF Corporate Park, S-Block, Qutab Enclave, Phase-III, Gurgaon-1220...

Case Number: 152

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2016

Tamil Nadu

M/s Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., V/S K.Lenin

Pepsico  

Court Name: Thiruvallur

Appelant Advocate A.Kalathi

Respondant Advocate M/s M.Kandaswamy

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTHIRUVALLURNo.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,THIRUVALLUR-602 001Complaint Case No. CC/72/20141. K.LeninSocial Activist, Law Exposure, Legal Awareness Organization, No.53, Kanniamman Koil St., Kanchina Kuppam, Chennai-98..............

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.